744 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21962842)
1. Long-term evaluation of biological versus mechanical prosthesis use at reoperative aortic valve replacement.
Chan V; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry P; Masters R; Mesana TG; Ruel M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Jul; 144(1):146-51. PubMed ID: 21962842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term follow up of patients undergoing reoperative surgery with aortic or mitral valve replacement using a St. Jude Medical prosthesis.
Emery RW; Krogh CC; McAdams S; Emery AM; Holter AR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jul; 19(4):473-84. PubMed ID: 20845896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gender differences in the long-term outcomes after valve replacement surgery.
Kulik A; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Goldstein W; Bédard P; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Heart; 2009 Feb; 95(4):318-26. PubMed ID: 18653574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Valve type and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement in older patients.
Schelbert EB; Vaughan-Sarrazin MS; Welke KF; Rosenthal GE
Heart; 2008 Sep; 94(9):1181-8. PubMed ID: 18070945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
Legarra JJ; Llorens R; Catalan M; Segura I; Trenor AM; de Buruaga JS; Rabago G; Sarralde A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome after aortic valve replacement in young adults: is patient profile more important than prosthesis type?
Klieverik LM; Noorlander M; Takkenberg JJ; Kappetein AP; Bekkers JA; van Herwerden LA; Bogers AJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):479-87; discussion 487. PubMed ID: 16901039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Mukundan S; Rosin MD
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Re-do aortic valve replacement: does a previous homograft influence the operative outcome?
Kumar P; Athanasiou T; Ali A; Nair S; Oz BS; DeSouza A; Moat N; Shore DF; Pepper JR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):904-12; discussion 912-3. PubMed ID: 15597580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term outcomes of valve replacement with modern prostheses in young adults.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Bédard P; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):425-33; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 15740951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fifteen years follow up with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén P; Bech-Hanssen O; Phipps B; Caidahl K
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 10888100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients.
McClure RS; Narayanasamy N; Wiegerinck E; Lipsitz S; Maloney A; Byrne JG; Aranki SF; Couper GS; Cohn LH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1410-6. PubMed ID: 20417753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Caprili L; Testolin L; Thiene G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decision-making in the choice of heart valve for replacement in patients aged 60-70 years: twenty-year follow up of the St. Jude Medical aortic valve prosthesis.
Emery RW; Arom KV; Kshettry VR; Kroshus TJ; Von R; Kersten TE; Lillehei TJ; Nicoloff DM; Erickson CA
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11 Suppl 1():S37-44. PubMed ID: 11843519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Third-time aortic valve replacement: patient characteristics and operative outcome.
Shaikhrezai K; Tasca G; Amrani M; Dreyfus G; Asimakopoulos G
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 89(2):479-83. PubMed ID: 20103324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of patient-prosthesis mismatch on long-term results after aortic valve replacement with a stented bioprosthesis.
Frapier JM; Rouvière P; Razcka F; Aymard T; Albat B; Chaptal PA
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jul; 11(4):543-51. PubMed ID: 12150304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: time-related outcomes and risk factors.
Alsoufi B; Al-Halees Z; Fadel B; Al-Wesabi A; Al-Ahmadi M; Joufan M; Siblini G; Canver CC
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May; 19(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 20583397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term results of mechanical and biological heart valves in dialysis and non-dialysis patients.
Böning A; Boedeker RH; Rosendahl UP; Niemann B; Haberer S; Roth P; Ennker JA
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Dec; 59(8):454-9. PubMed ID: 21544790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
