These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21962943)

  • 1. Combination of misoprostol and mechanical dilation for induction of labour: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kehl S; Ehard A; Berlit S; Spaich S; Sütterlin M; Siemer J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 159(2):315-9. PubMed ID: 21962943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Women's acceptance of a double-balloon device as an additional method for inducing labour.
    Kehl S; Welzel G; Ehard A; Berlit S; Spaich S; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 May; 168(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 23298898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
    Kehl S; Ziegler J; Schleussner E; Tuschy B; Berlit S; Kirscht J; Hägele F; Weiss C; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
    BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 25327872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term: a retrospective cohort study.
    Kehl S; Weiss C; Dammer U; Heimrich J; Beckmann MW; Faschingbauer F; Sütterlin M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Sep; 204():78-82. PubMed ID: 27525685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
    Ayad IA
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Cecatti JG; Tedesco RP; Pires HM; Calderon IM; Faúndes A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol.
    Rust OA; Greybush M; Atlas RO; Jones KJ; Balducci J
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):899-904. PubMed ID: 11725734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
    Owolabi AT; Kuti O; Ogunlola IO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 25(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 16234141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial.
    Bricker L; Peden H; Tomlinson AJ; Al-Hussaini TK; Idama T; Candelier C; Luckas M; Furniss H; Davies A; Kumar B; Roberts J; Alfirevic Z
    BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1503-11. PubMed ID: 18752586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of intracervical and intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction in patients with an unfavourable cervix.
    Srisomboon J; Piyamongkol W; Aiewsakul P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1997 Mar; 80(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 9175387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
    How HY; Leaseburge L; Khoury JC; Siddiqi TA; Spinnato JA; Sibai BM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term.
    Zeteroğlu S; Engin-Ustün Y; Ustün Y; Güvercinçi M; Sahin G; Kamaci M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 16753768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective double blind study using oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction.
    Mehrotra S; Singh U; Gupta HP
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):461-4. PubMed ID: 20604647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised double-blind study of vaginal misoprostol vs dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction in prolonged pregnancy.
    Lee HY
    Singapore Med J; 1997 Jul; 38(7):292-4. PubMed ID: 9339095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
    Fonseca L; Wood HC; Lucas MJ; Ramin SM; Phatak D; Gilstrap LC; Yeomans ER
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.