BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21963038)

  • 1. Simultaneous backscatter and attenuation estimation using a least squares method with constraints.
    Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2096-104. PubMed ID: 21963038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimates in layered tissue-mimicking phantoms among three clinical scanners.
    Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Madsen EL; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Oct; 34(4):209-21. PubMed ID: 23160474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of fatty proportion in fatty liver using least squares method with constraints.
    Li X; Deng Y; Yu J; Wang Y; Shamdasani V
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2811-20. PubMed ID: 25226986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficient estimates of rodent-tumor-mimicking structures: comparison of results among clinical scanners.
    Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Pawlicki AD; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Oct; 33(4):233-50. PubMed ID: 22518954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scatterer number density considerations in reference phantom-based attenuation estimation.
    Rubert N; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1680-96. PubMed ID: 24726800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Method for estimating total attenuation from a spatial map of attenuation slope for quantitative ultrasound imaging.
    Pawlicki AD; O'Brien WD
    Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 23493614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the statistics of quantitative ultrasound techniques with deformation compounding: an experimental study.
    Herd MT; Hall TJ; Jiang J; Zagzebski JA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2066-74. PubMed ID: 22033132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
    Liu W; Zagzebski JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Theoretical and phantom based investigation of the impact of sound speed and backscatter variations on attenuation slope estimation.
    Omari E; Lee H; Varghese T
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Aug; 51(6):758-67. PubMed ID: 21477832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attenuation estimation using spectral cross-correlation.
    Kim H; Varghese T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Mar; 54(3):510-9. PubMed ID: 17375820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.
    Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):146-61. PubMed ID: 23493613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attenuation and backscatter estimation using video signal analysis applied to B-mode images.
    Knipp BS; Zagzebski JA; Wilson TA; Dong F; Madsen EL
    Ultrason Imaging; 1997 Jul; 19(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 9447670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the impact of backscatter intensity variations on ultrasound attenuation estimation.
    Omari EA; Varghese T; Madsen EL; Frank G
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082904. PubMed ID: 23927359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hybrid spectral domain method for attenuation slope estimation.
    Kim H; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1808-19. PubMed ID: 18621468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanisms for attenuation in cancellous-bone-mimicking phantoms.
    Wear KA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Nov; 55(11):2418-25. PubMed ID: 19049921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic Properties of Breast Fat.
    Nasief HG; Rosado-Mendez IM; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2007-16. PubMed ID: 26446820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amplitude based segmentation of ultrasound echoes for attenuation coefficient estimation.
    Civale J; Bamber J; Harris E
    Ultrasonics; 2021 Mar; 111():106302. PubMed ID: 33264741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simultaneous estimation of cortical bone thickness and acoustic wave velocity using a multivariable optimization approach: Bone phantom and in-vitro study.
    Tasinkevych Y; Podhajecki J; FaliƄska K; Litniewski J
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():105-12. PubMed ID: 26522955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental application of ultrafast imaging to spectral tissue characterization.
    Garcia-Duitama J; Chayer B; Han A; Garcia D; Oelze ML; Cloutier G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 41(9):2506-19. PubMed ID: 26119459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of region-of-interest length on estimates of myocardial ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter.
    Baldwin SL; Holland MR; Sosnovik DE; Miller JG
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):418-26. PubMed ID: 15789588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.