718 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21963062)
1. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of periodic monitoring and feedback on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates, and patient satisfaction scores.
Lin OS; Kozarek RA; Arai A; Gluck M; Jiranek GC; Kowdley KV; McCormick SE; Schembre DB; Soon MS; Dominitz JA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jun; 71(7):1253-9. PubMed ID: 20598251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates.
Chung SJ; Kim D; Song JH; Park MJ; Kim YS; Kim JS; Jung HC; Song IS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 20493487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.
Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adenoma detection rates vary minimally with time of day and case rank: a prospective study of 2139 first screening colonoscopies.
Leffler DA; Kheraj R; Bhansali A; Yamanaka H; Neeman N; Sheth S; Sawhney M; Lamont JT; Aronson MD
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):554-60. PubMed ID: 22341102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.
East JE; Stavrindis M; Thomas-Gibson S; Guenther T; Tekkis PP; Saunders BP
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Sep; 28(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 18715401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy.
Sanaka MR; Deepinder F; Thota PN; Lopez R; Burke CA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jul; 104(7):1659-64; quiz 1665. PubMed ID: 19491841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy.
Millan MS; Gross P; Manilich E; Church JM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Aug; 51(8):1217-20. PubMed ID: 18500502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.
Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3).
Adler A; Wegscheider K; Lieberman D; Aminalai A; Aschenbeck J; Drossel R; Mayr M; Mroß M; Scheel M; Schröder A; Gerber K; Stange G; Roll S; Gauger U; Wiedenmann B; Altenhofen L; Rosch T
Gut; 2013 Feb; 62(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 22442161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection.
Buchner AM; Shahid MW; Heckman MG; Diehl NN; McNeil RB; Cleveland P; Gill KR; Schore A; Ghabril M; Raimondo M; Gross SA; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jun; 73(6):1223-31. PubMed ID: 21481861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates.
Sherer EA; Imler TD; Imperiale TF
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):545-53. PubMed ID: 22138085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
Shaukat A; Shamsi N; Menk J; Church TR; Rank J; Colton JB
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2034-2041. PubMed ID: 30312788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.
Simmons DT; Harewood GC; Baron TH; Petersen BT; Wang KK; Boyd-Enders F; Ott BJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Sep; 24(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 16948808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance.
Wang HS; Pisegna J; Modi R; Liang LJ; Atia M; Nguyen M; Cohen H; Ohning G; van Oijen M; Spiegel BM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jan; 77(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 23261096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Different bowel preparation schedule leads to different diagnostic yield of proximal and nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasm at screening colonoscopy in average-risk population.
Chiu HM; Lin JT; Lee YC; Liang JT; Shun CT; Wang HP; Wu MS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Dec; 54(12):1570-7. PubMed ID: 22067187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
