233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21963069)
1. A randomized comparison of ultrathin and standard colonoscope in cecal intubation rate and patient tolerance.
Luo DJ; Hui AJ; Yan KK; Ng SC; Wong VW; Chan FK; Cheong JP; Lam PP; Tse YK; Lau JY
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):484-90. PubMed ID: 21963069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Propofol sedation for colonoscopy with a new ultrathin or a standard endoscope: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Töx U; Schumacher B; Toermer T; Terheggen G; Mertens J; Holzapfel B; Lehmacher W; Goeser T; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2013 Jun; 45(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 23468196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrathin versus pediatric instruments for colonoscopy in older female patients: A randomized trial.
Nemoto D; Utano K; Endo S; Isohata N; Hewett DG; Togashi K
Dig Endosc; 2017 Mar; 29(2):168-174. PubMed ID: 27859645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of the performance of ultrathin vs. standard colonoscopes.
Sofi AA; Nawras A; Khan MA; Howden CW; Lee WM
Endoscopy; 2017 Apr; 49(4):351-358. PubMed ID: 27852099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope decreases the dose of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison of 3 colonoscopes.
Lee DW; Li AC; Ko CW; Chu DW; Chan KC; Poon CM; Sin KS; Leung KF; Sze TS; Chan AC; Chung SC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Mar; 65(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 17321243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in comparison with regular colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Lee YT; Lai LH; Hui AJ; Wong VW; Ching JY; Wong GL; Wu JC; Chan HL; Leung WK; Lau JY; Sung JJ; Chan FK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jan; 104(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 19098847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-balloon colonoscopy versus repeat standard colonoscopy for previous incomplete colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial.
Keswani RN
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):507-12. PubMed ID: 21145054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial.
Garborg KK; Løberg M; Matre J; Holme O; Kalager M; Hoff G; Bretthauer M
Endoscopy; 2012 Aug; 44(8):740-6. PubMed ID: 22622786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomized study of the use of an ultrathin colonoscope versus a pediatric colonoscope in sedation-optional colonoscopy.
Sato K; Ito S; Kitagawa T; Hirahata K; Hihara D; Tominaga K; Yasuda I; Maetani I
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5150-5158. PubMed ID: 28488178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of discomfort during colonoscopy with conventional and ultrathin colonoscopes in ulcerative colitis patients.
Ogawa T; Ohda Y; Nagase K; Kono T; Tozawa K; Tomita T; Iimuro M; Hida N; Oshima T; Fukui H; Hori K; Watari J; Nakamura S; Miwa H
Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 24995962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long pediatric colonoscope versus intermediate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy.
Hsieh YH; Zhou AL; Lin HJ
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 2):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 18702687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of a transparent hood on the performance of total colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Harada Y; Hirasawa D; Fujita N; Noda Y; Kobayashi G; Ishida K; Yonechi M; Ito K; Suzuki T; Sugawara T; Horaguchi J; Takasawa O; Obana T; Oohira T; Onochi K; Kanno Y; Kuroha M; Iwai W
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Mar; 69(3 Pt 2):637-44. PubMed ID: 19251004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sedation-free colonoscopy using an upper endoscope is tolerable and effective in patients with low body mass index: a prospective randomized study.
Park CH; Lee WS; Joo YE; Kim HS; Choi SK; Rew JS; Kim SJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Nov; 101(11):2504-10. PubMed ID: 17090280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of bending section length on insertion and retroflexion properties of pediatric and adult colonoscopes.
Kessler WR; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1290-5. PubMed ID: 15929759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective randomized study on the benefits of a new small-caliber colonoscope.
Sato K; Ito S; Shigiyama F; Kitagawa T; Hirahata K; Tominaga K; Maetani I
Endoscopy; 2012 Aug; 44(8):746-53. PubMed ID: 22833021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colonoscopy using a small-caliber colonoscope with passive-bending after incomplete colonoscopy due to sharp angulation or pain.
Sato K; Shigiyama F; Ito S; Kitagawa T; Tominaga K; Suzuki T; Maetani I
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4171-6. PubMed ID: 23722893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for colonoscopy in adults.
Saifuddin T; Trivedi M; King PD; Madsen R; Marshall JB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 10699777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrathin colonoscope with a diameter of 9.8 mm for total colonoscopy.
Okamoto M; Kawabe T; Kato J; Yamaji Y; Ikenoue T; Omata M
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2005 Sep; 39(8):679-83. PubMed ID: 16082276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope.
Pasha SF; Harrison ME; Das A; Corrado CM; Arnell KN; Leighton JA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 May; 65(6):848-53. PubMed ID: 17324408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
