233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21963069)
21. Comparison on colonoscopic parameters according to length of adult-colonoscope.
Lee SH; Lee DJ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 24384429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Magnetic endoscopic imaging versus standard colonoscopy in a routine colonoscopy setting: a randomized, controlled trial.
Holme Ö; Höie O; Matre J; Stallemo A; Garborg K; Hasund A; Wiig H; Hoff G; Bretthauer M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jun; 73(6):1215-22. PubMed ID: 21481862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does the use of a variable stiffness colonoscope offer advantages during colonoscopy under deep sedation? Results of a randomized trial.
Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; Brotons A; Sáez J; Girona E; Pérez E; Picó MD; Grau C; Sillero C
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jul; 23(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 21593674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefulness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope.
Kondo S; Yamaji Y; Watabe H; Yamada A; Sugimoto T; Ohta M; Ogura K; Okamoto M; Yoshida H; Kawabe T; Omata M
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 17100978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Water exchange enhanced cecal intubation in potentially difficult colonoscopy. Unsedated patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Luo H; Zhang L; Liu X; Leung FW; Liu Z; Wang X; Xue L; Wu K; Fan D; Pan Y; Guo X
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 May; 77(5):767-73. PubMed ID: 23394837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Does "responsive insertion technology" improve practice of colonoscopy? Results of a randomized study.
Cuesta R; Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; García Sepulcre MF; Morillo E; Vázquez N
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 24417584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A randomized controlled trial in a training institution comparing a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, a pediatric colonoscope, and an adult colonoscope.
Shumaker DA; Zaman A; Katon RM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Feb; 55(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 11818918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Technical considerations and patient comfort in total colonoscopy with and without a transparent cap: initial experiences from a pilot study.
Dafnis GM
Endoscopy; 2000 May; 32(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 10817176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Randomized trial of standard versus magnetic endoscope imaging colonoscopes for unsedated colonoscopy.
Shergill AK; McQuaid KR; Deleon A; McAnanama M; Shah JN
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 May; 75(5):1031-1036.e1. PubMed ID: 22381532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos).
Waye JD; Heigh RI; Fleischer DE; Leighton JA; Gurudu S; Aldrich LB; Li J; Ramrakhiani S; Edmundowicz SA; Early DS; Jonnalagadda S; Bresalier RS; Kessler WR; Rex DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):551-6. PubMed ID: 20018280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy.
Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Kajiyama M; Fujii H; Tanaka N
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1936-40. PubMed ID: 15447752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A prospective trial of variable stiffness colonoscopes with different tip diameters in unsedated patients.
Chen PJ; Shih YL; Chu HC; Chang WK; Hsieh TY; Chao YC
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Jun; 103(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 18513270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A motor-driven single-use colonoscope controlled with a hand-held device: a feasibility study in volunteers.
Rösch T; Adler A; Pohl H; Wettschureck E; Koch M; Wiedenmann B; Hoepffner N
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1139-46. PubMed ID: 18355823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Tapered colonoscope performs better than the pediatric colonoscope in female patients: a direct comparison through tandem colonoscopy.
Anderson JC; Walker G; Birk JW; Alpern Z; Von Althen I
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Jun; 65(7):1042-7. PubMed ID: 17331512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Push enteroscopy has a 96% cecal intubation rate in colonoscopies that failed because of redundant colons.
Jackson CS; Haq T; Olafsson S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Aug; 74(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 21689815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Ng SC; Tsoi KK; Hirai HW; Lee YT; Wu JC; Sung JJ; Chan FK; Lau JY
Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Aug; 107(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 22664471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cap-assisted water immersion for minimal sedation colonoscopy: prospective, randomized, single-center trial.
Falt P; Šmajstrla V; Fojtík P; Liberda M; Kliment M; Tvrdík J; Urban O
Dig Endosc; 2013 Jul; 25(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 23808948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.
Fatima H; Rex DK; Rothstein R; Rahmani E; Nehme O; Dewitt J; Helper D; Toor A; Bensen S
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jan; 6(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18065277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope.
Shumaker DA; Zaman A; Katon RM
Endoscopy; 2002 Sep; 34(9):711-4. PubMed ID: 12195328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Othman MO; Bradley AG; Choudhary A; Hoffman RM; Roy PK
Endoscopy; 2009 Jan; 41(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 19160154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
