These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21963236)

  • 1. A modular framework for the automatic classification of chromosomes in Q-band images.
    Poletti E; Grisan E; Ruggeri A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Feb; 105(2):120-30. PubMed ID: 21963236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic classification of chromosomes in Q-band images.
    Poletti E; Grisan E; Ruggeri A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():1911-4. PubMed ID: 19163063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic segmentation and disentangling of chromosomes in Q-band prometaphase images.
    Grisan E; Poletti E; Ruggeri A
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 Jul; 13(4):575-81. PubMed ID: 19193514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of thresholding strategies applied to human chromosome segmentation.
    Poletti E; Zappelli F; Ruggeri A; Grisan E
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Nov; 108(2):679-88. PubMed ID: 22261220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classification of chromosomes using a probabilistic neural network.
    Sweeney WP; Musavi MT; Guidi JN
    Cytometry; 1994 May; 16(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 8033731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated chromosome classification limitations due to image processing.
    Stanley R; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1995; 31():183-8. PubMed ID: 7654959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A rule-based computer scheme for centromere identification and polarity assignment of metaphase chromosomes.
    Wang X; Zheng B; Li S; Mulvihill JJ; Liu H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Jan; 89(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 18082909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stylized chromosome images.
    Martin AO; Isenstein BS; Thomas CW; Rzeszotarski MS; Johnson WE
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 2307061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic classification of chromosomes as part of a routine system for clinical analysis.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Maahr J
    Cytometry; 1986 Jan; 7(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 3948602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic chromosome analysis. II. Karyotyping of banded human chromosomes using band transition sequences.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Granum E; Philip J; Philip K
    Clin Genet; 1981 Jan; 19(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 7460378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical methods for classification of human chromosomes.
    Habbema JD
    Biometrics; 1979 Mar; 35(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 497330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel metric for bone marrow cells chromosome pairing.
    Khmelinskii A; Ventura R; Sanches J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 57(6):1420-9. PubMed ID: 20172790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Karyotyping of comparative genomic hybridization human metaphases using kernel nearest-neighbor algorithm.
    Yu K; Ji L
    Cytometry; 2002 Aug; 48(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 12210144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robust band profile extraction using constrained nonparametric machine-learning technique.
    Khan S; Sanches J; Ventura R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Oct; 57(10):2587-91. PubMed ID: 20643597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between G band number and chromosome length from prophase to metaphase.
    Jagielski J; Haus O
    Acta Physiol Pol; 1983; 34(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 6637533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic karyotype analysis.
    Graham J; Piper J
    Methods Mol Biol; 1994; 29():141-85. PubMed ID: 8032408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Geometric correction of deformed chromosomes for automatic Karyotyping.
    Khan S; DSouza A; Sanches J; Ventura R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4438-41. PubMed ID: 23366912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatically inferred Markov network models for classification of chromosomal band pattern structures.
    Granum E; Thomason MG
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 2307060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An expert diagnostic system based on neural networks and image analysis techniques in the field of automated cytogenetics.
    Beksaç MS; Eskiizmirliler S; Cakar AN; Erkmen AM; Dağdeviren A; Lundsteen C
    Technol Health Care; 1996 Mar; 3(4):217-29. PubMed ID: 8705397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Data-driven homologue matching for chromosome identification.
    Stanley RJ; Keller JM; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Jun; 17(3):451-62. PubMed ID: 9735908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.