These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21963236)

  • 21. Maximum-likelihood techniques for joint segmentation-classification of multispectral chromosome images.
    Schwartzkopf WC; Bovik AC; Evans BL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Dec; 24(12):1593-610. PubMed ID: 16350919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On fully automatic feature measurement for banded chromosome classification.
    Piper J; Granum E
    Cytometry; 1989 May; 10(3):242-55. PubMed ID: 2714109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Computer-assisted karyotyping system of banded chromosomes.
    Bruschi C; Tedeschi F; Puglisi PP; Marmiroli N
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1981; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 7460628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automating Giemsa banding of chromosomes: protocol for and evaluation of the use of a programmable, high-throughput automatic stainer.
    Gregory C; Maher E
    Biotech Histochem; 2009 Dec; 84(6):337-45. PubMed ID: 19384744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Automatic chromosome pairing using mutual information.
    Khmelinskii A; Ventura R; Sanches J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():1918-21. PubMed ID: 19163065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The DNA-based human karyotype.
    Mayall BH; Carrano AV; Moore DH; Ashworth LK; Bennett DE; Mendelsohn ML
    Cytometry; 1984 Jul; 5(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 6205836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Band features as classification measures for G-banded chromosome analysis.
    Johnston DA; Tang KS; Zimmerman S
    Comput Biol Med; 1993 Mar; 23(2):115-29. PubMed ID: 8513663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Homologue matching using the Choquet integral.
    Stanley RJ; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 34():315-20. PubMed ID: 9603059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Application of artificial neural networks to chromosome classification.
    Errington PA; Graham J
    Cytometry; 1993; 14(6):627-39. PubMed ID: 8404369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cascaded differential and wavelet compression of chromosome images.
    Liu Z; Xiong Z; Wu Q; Wang YP; Castleman K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Apr; 49(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 11942729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Constrained Markov networks for automated analysis of G-banded chromosomes.
    Guthrie C; Gregor J; Thomason MG
    Comput Biol Med; 1993 Mar; 23(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 8513662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Classifier-assisted metric for chromosome pairing.
    Ventura R; Khmelinskii A; Sanches J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():6729-32. PubMed ID: 21096087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automatic target recognition using a feature-decomposition and data-decomposition modular neural network.
    Wang LC; Der SZ; Nasrabadi NM
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 1998; 7(8):1113-21. PubMed ID: 18276328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automatic endotracheal tube position confirmation system based on image classification--a preliminary assessment.
    Lederman D; Lampotang S; Shamir MY
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):1017-26. PubMed ID: 21555232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Experience with the Athena semi-automated karyotyping system.
    Mayall BH; Tucker JD; Christensen ML; van Vliet LJ; Young IT
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 2307063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Human chromosome classification using multilayer perceptron neural network.
    Lerner B; Guterman H; Dinstein I; Romem Y
    Int J Neural Syst; 1995 Sep; 6(3):359-70. PubMed ID: 8589868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automated classification of metaphase chromosomes: optimization of an adaptive computerized scheme.
    Wang X; Zheng B; Li S; Mulvihill JJ; Wood MC; Liu H
    J Biomed Inform; 2009 Feb; 42(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18585097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Chromosome image enhancement using multiscale differential operators.
    Wang YP; Wu Q; Castleman KR; Xiong Z
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 May; 22(5):685-93. PubMed ID: 12846437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. PIXEL SENSIBLE LOCAL BAND ANALYSIS IN MICROSCOPIC CHROMOSOME IMAGES USING CSPA.
    Somasundaram D
    Tsitol Genet; 2016; 50(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 27266185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Feature normalization via expectation maximization and unsupervised nonparametric classification for M-FISH chromosome images.
    Choi H; Bovik AC; Castleman KR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Aug; 27(8):1107-19. PubMed ID: 18672428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.