These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21963330)
21. Effects of modality presentation on working memory in school-age children: evidence for the pictorial superiority hypothesis. Constantinidou F; Danos MA; Nelson D; Baker S Child Neuropsychol; 2011; 17(2):173-96. PubMed ID: 21271411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A facilitative effect of negative affective valence on working memory. Gotoh F; Kikuchi T; Olofsson U Scand J Psychol; 2010 Jun; 51(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 20132459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The benefit of surface uniformity for encoding boundary features in visual working memory. Kim SH; Kim JO J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1767-83. PubMed ID: 21967272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Visual search and location probability learning from variable perspectives. Jiang YV; Swallow KM; Capistrano CG J Vis; 2013 May; 13(6):13. PubMed ID: 23716120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention. Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Implicit attentional orienting in a target detection task with central cues. Peterson SA; Gibson TN Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1532-47. PubMed ID: 21807536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients]. Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. Olivers CN J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Implicit short-term memory and event frequency effects in visual search. Maljkovic V; Martini P Vision Res; 2005 Oct; 45(21):2831-46. PubMed ID: 16023172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex activity associated with individual differences in arbitrary delayed paired-association learning performance: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Tanabe HC; Sadato N Neuroscience; 2009 May; 160(3):688-97. PubMed ID: 19285546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Attending to unrelated targets boosts short-term memory for color arrays. Makovski T; Swallow KM; Jiang YV Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1498-505. PubMed ID: 21145331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Learned reward association improves visual working memory. Gong M; Li S J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):841-56. PubMed ID: 24392741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contrasting early visual cortical activation states causally involved in visual imagery and short-term memory. Cattaneo Z; Vecchi T; Pascual-Leone A; Silvanto J Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 30(7):1393-400. PubMed ID: 19788574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Consolidation of multifeature items in visual working memory: central capacity requirements for visual consolidation. Stevanovski B; Jolicœur P Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1108-19. PubMed ID: 21327744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of feature and spatial attention on visual change detection. Kimura M; Katayama J; Murohashi H Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 18303587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interference between nonspatial stimulus features in the Simon effect. Tagliabue M; Umiltà C; Spera P Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(4):431-53. PubMed ID: 20066924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]