These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. CLEVER: pipeline for designing in silico chemical libraries. Song CM; Bernardo PH; Chai CL; Tong JC J Mol Graph Model; 2009 Jan; 27(5):578-83. PubMed ID: 18986817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PGVL Hub: An integrated desktop tool for medicinal chemists to streamline design and synthesis of chemical libraries and singleton compounds. Peng Z; Yang B; Mattaparti S; Shulok T; Thacher T; Kong J; Kostrowicki J; Hu Q; Na J; Zhou JZ; Klatte D; Chao B; Ito S; Clark J; Sciammetta N; Coner B; Waller C; Kuki A Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 685():295-320. PubMed ID: 20981530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic tailoring and transplanting: a practical method that makes virtual screening more useful. Li Y; Zhao Y; Liu Z; Wang R J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jun; 51(6):1474-91. PubMed ID: 21520918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of QSAR and shape pharmacophore modeling approaches for targeted chemical library design. Ebalunode JO; Zheng W; Tropsha A Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 685():111-33. PubMed ID: 20981521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chemical feature-based pharmacophores and virtual library screening for discovery of new leads. Langer T; Krovat EM Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2003 May; 6(3):370-6. PubMed ID: 12833670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated recycling of chemistry for virtual screening and library design. Vainio MJ; Kogej T; Raubacher F J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jul; 52(7):1777-86. PubMed ID: 22657574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. LEAP into the Pfizer Global Virtual Library (PGVL) space: creation of readily synthesizable design ideas automatically. Hu Q; Peng Z; Kostrowicki J; Kuki A Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 685():253-76. PubMed ID: 20981528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of computational methods in the identification of bioactive compounds. Glick M; Jacoby E Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2011 Aug; 15(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 21411361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chemical probes for biological systems. Garcia-Serna R; Mestres J Drug Discov Today; 2011 Feb; 16(3-4):99-106. PubMed ID: 21093609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using computational techniques in fragment-based drug discovery. Desjarlais RL Methods Enzymol; 2011; 493():137-55. PubMed ID: 21371590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fragment analysis in small molecule discovery. Merlot C; Domine D; Church DJ Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2002 May; 5(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 12058614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A scalable approach to combinatorial library design. Sharma P; Salapaka S; Beck C Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 685():71-89. PubMed ID: 20981519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. From virtuality to reality - Virtual screening in lead discovery and lead optimization: a medicinal chemistry perspective. Rester U Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 Jul; 11(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 18600572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]