These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21964797)

  • 1. Cervical cancer screening among HIV-infected women: an economic evaluation in a middle-income country.
    Vanni T; Luz PM; Grinsztejn B; Veloso VG; Foss A; Mesa-Frias M; Legood R
    Int J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 131(2):E96-104. PubMed ID: 21964797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Economic evaluation of strategies for managing women with equivocal cytological results in Brazil.
    Vanni T; Legood R; Franco EL; Villa LL; Luz PM; Schwartsmann G
    Int J Cancer; 2011 Aug; 129(3):671-9. PubMed ID: 20886598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
    JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2382-90. PubMed ID: 11988059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Three Approaches for Cervical Cancer Screening among HIV-Positive Women in Johannesburg, South Africa.
    Lince-Deroche N; Phiri J; Michelow P; Smith JS; Firnhaber C
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141969. PubMed ID: 26569487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost effectiveness of human papillomavirus testing to augment cervical cancer screening in women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.
    Goldie SJ; Freedberg KA; Weinstein MC; Wright TC; Kuntz KM
    Am J Med; 2001 Aug; 111(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 11498068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical cancer screening program based on primary DNA-HPV testing in a Brazilian city: a cost-effectiveness study protocol.
    Teixeira JC; Vale DB; Bragança JF; Campos CS; Discacciati MG; Zeferino LC
    BMC Public Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):576. PubMed ID: 32345284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of increasing cervical cancer screening coverage in the Middle East: An example from Lebanon.
    Sharma M; Seoud M; Kim JJ
    Vaccine; 2017 Jan; 35(4):564-569. PubMed ID: 28017434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based cervical cancer screening in the public health system in Nicaragua.
    Campos NG; Mvundura M; Jeronimo J; Holme F; Vodicka E; Kim JJ
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(6):e015048. PubMed ID: 28619772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The costs, clinical benefits, and cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in HIV-infected women.
    Goldie SJ; Weinstein MC; Kuntz KM; Freedberg KA
    Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jan; 130(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 10068381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing.
    van Rosmalen J; de Kok IM; van Ballegooijen M
    BJOG; 2012 May; 119(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 22251259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The health and economic effects of HPV DNA screening in The Netherlands.
    Berkhof J; Coupé VM; Bogaards JA; van Kemenade FJ; Helmerhorst TJ; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
    Int J Cancer; 2010 Nov; 127(9):2147-58. PubMed ID: 20112339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness analysis for Pap smear screening and human papillomavirus DNA testing and vaccination.
    Chen MK; Hung HF; Duffy S; Yen AM; Chen HH
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Dec; 17(6):1050-8. PubMed ID: 21679279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Vaccinated Against Human Papillomavirus.
    Kim JJ; Burger EA; Sy S; Campos NG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Feb; 109(2):. PubMed ID: 27754955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To expand coverage, or increase frequency: Quantifying the tradeoffs between equity and efficiency facing cervical cancer screening programs in low-resource settings.
    Campos NG; Tsu V; Jeronimo J; Mvundura M; Lee K; Kim JJ
    Int J Cancer; 2017 Mar; 140(6):1293-1305. PubMed ID: 27925175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus DNA testing in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, France, and Italy.
    Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jun; 97(12):888-95. PubMed ID: 15956650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of primary cytology and HPV DNA cervical screening.
    Bistoletti P; Sennfält K; Dillner J
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Jan; 122(2):372-6. PubMed ID: 17935124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in Québec, Canada.
    Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Mayrand MH; Santas CC; Goggin P
    Can J Public Health; 2010; 101(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 20737813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
    Berkhof J; Bogaards JA; Demirel E; Diaz M; Sharma M; Kim JJ
    Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31 Suppl 7():H71-9. PubMed ID: 24332299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Clinical and Economic Benefits of Co-Testing Versus Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Modeling Analysis.
    Felix JC; Lacey MJ; Miller JD; Lenhart GM; Spitzer M; Kulkarni R
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 Jun; 25(6):606-16. PubMed ID: 27023044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Projected cost-effectiveness of repeat high-risk human papillomavirus testing using self-collected vaginal samples in the Swedish cervical cancer screening program.
    Östensson E; Hellström AC; Hellman K; Gustavsson I; Gyllensten U; Wilander E; Zethraeus N; Andersson S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Jul; 92(7):830-40. PubMed ID: 23530870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.