227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21965462)
21. Performance of High Flow Rate Personal Respirable Samplers When Challenged with Mineral Aerosols of Different Particle Size Distributions.
Stacey P; Thorpe A; Echt A
Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 May; 60(4):479-92. PubMed ID: 26865560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of six inhalable aerosol samplers.
Li SN; Lundgren DA; Rovell-Rixx D
AIHAJ; 2000; 61(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 10976680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of increased sampling pump flow rates in a disposable, inhalable aerosol sampler.
Stewart J; Sleeth DK; Handy RG; Pahler LF; Anthony TR; Volckens J
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Mar; 14(3):207-213. PubMed ID: 27676440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of a novel personal nanoparticle sampler.
Zhou Y; Irshad H; Tsai CJ; Hung SM; Cheng YS
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 Feb; 16(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 24337074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance of high flow rate samplers for respirable particle collection.
Lee T; Kim SW; Chisholm WP; Slaven J; Harper M
Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Aug; 54(6):697-709. PubMed ID: 20660144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of the sampling efficiencies of a range of atmosphere samplers when collecting polymeric diphenylmethane di-isocyanate (MDI) aerosols.
Hext PM; Booth K; Dharmarajan V; Karoly WJ; Parekh PP; Spence M
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):346-57. PubMed ID: 12746078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A headset-mounted mini sampler for measuring exposure to welding aerosol in the breathing zone.
Lidén G; Surakka J
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):99-116. PubMed ID: 19196747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Air sampling methodology for asphalt fume in asphalt production and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities: total particulate sampler versus inhalable particulate sampler.
Calzavara TS; Carter CM; Axten C
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 12746079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Aspiration and sampling efficiencies of the TSP and louvered particulate matter inlets.
Kenny L; Beaumont G; Gudmundsson A; Thorpe A; Koch W
J Environ Monit; 2005 May; 7(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 15877170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Performance evaluation of disposable inhalable aerosol sampler at a copper electrorefinery.
Lee EG; Grimson PJ; Chisholm WP; Kashon ML; He X; L'Orange C; Volckens J
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Mar; 16(3):250-257. PubMed ID: 30640589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance characteristics of PM10 samplers under calm air conditions.
Lai CY; Chen CC
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Apr; 50(4):578-87. PubMed ID: 10786010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Wood dust sampling: field evaluation of personal samplers when large particles are present.
Lee T; Harper M; Slaven JE; Lee K; Rando RJ; Maples EH
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Mar; 55(2):180-91. PubMed ID: 21036895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Particle-phase collection efficiency of the OVS and IFV Pro personal pesticide samplers.
Alex S; Sovers M; O'Shaughnessy PT
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2021 Dec; 18(12):579-589. PubMed ID: 34612175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Performance of prototype high-flow inhalable dust sampler in a livestock production facility.
Anthony TR; Cai C; Mehaffy J; Sleeth D; Volckens J
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 May; 14(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 27792469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Field comparison of three inhalable samplers (IOM, PGP-GSP 3.5 and Button) for welding fumes.
Zugasti A; Montes N; Rojo JM; Quintana MJ
J Environ Monit; 2012 Feb; 14(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 22037834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. New experimental methods for the development and evaluation of aerosol samplers.
Brixey LA; Paik SY; Evans DE; Vincent JH
J Environ Monit; 2002 Oct; 4(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 12400907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Computational fluid dynamics investigation of human aspiration in low-velocity air: orientation effects on mouth-breathing simulations.
Anthony TR; Anderson KR
Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jul; 57(6):740-57. PubMed ID: 23316076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Field testing of new aerosol sampling method with a porous curved surface as inlet.
Hauck BC; Grinshpun SA; Reponen A; Reponen T; Willeke K; Bornschein RL
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Oct; 58(10):713-9. PubMed ID: 9342831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Aerosol sampling by annular aspiration slots.
Görner P; Witschger O; Roger F; Wrobel R; Fabriès JF
J Environ Monit; 2008 Dec; 10(12):1437-47. PubMed ID: 19037485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
