These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21966686)

  • 1. Examiners’ perception of Objective Structured Examination in colposcopy.
    Qureshi NS
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(9):773-4. PubMed ID: 21966686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examiners' perceptions of the objective structured clinical examination in colposcopy.
    Qureshi NS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Feb; 33(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 23445146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A validity study of the national UK colposcopy objective structured clinical examination--is it a test fit for purpose?
    Shehmar M; Cruikshank M; Finn C; Redman C; Fraser I; Peile E
    BJOG; 2009 Dec; 116(13):1796-9; discussion 1799-800. PubMed ID: 19906021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of early performance on examiners' marking patterns during an oral examination.
    Brown MH; Regehr G; Reznick RK
    Acad Med; 1996 Jan; 71(1 Suppl):S73-5. PubMed ID: 8546789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re: Qureshi NS. 2013. Examiners' perceptions of the objective structured clinical examination in colposcopy. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 33:188-190.
    Lemon TI; Lampard R; Shah RD; Stone BA
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Aug; 33(6):645. PubMed ID: 23919879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical skills assessment: comparison of student and examiner assessment in an objective structured clinical examination.
    Jahan F; Sadaf S; Bhanji S; Naeem N; Qureshi R
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2011 Aug; 24(2):421. PubMed ID: 22081647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to do well in the OSPHE: examiner comments about candidate performances in the Faculty membership examination Part B (OSPHE).
    Packham C;
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2016 Mar; 38(1):189-90. PubMed ID: 25645565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reports on the higher examination. A survey of the examiners' comments and advice to candidates 1966-74.
    Carter PH
    Arch Virol; 1975; 41(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 1202567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Colposcopy training and assessment across the member countries of the European Federation for Colposcopy.
    Moss EL; Redman CW; Arbyn M; Dollery E; Petry KU; Nieminen P; Myerson N; Leeson SC
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():124-8. PubMed ID: 25839437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Should non-expert clinician examiners be used in objective structured assessment of communication skills among final year medical undergraduates?
    Wong ML; Fones CS; Aw M; Tan CH; Low PS; Amin Z; Wong PS; Goh PS; Wai CT; Ong B; Tambyah P; Koh DR
    Med Teach; 2007 Nov; 29(9):927-32. PubMed ID: 18158667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examiners' beliefs about the utility and the appropriateness of different examination techniques.
    Wakeford R
    Med Educ; 1985 Nov; 19(6):505-6. PubMed ID: 4069030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An alternative certification examination ("ACE") in surgery.
    Morris MC; Gillis AE; Smoothey CO; Hennessy M; Conlon KC; Ridgway PF
    J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(6):779-89. PubMed ID: 25027510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feedback on trainee doctors: a faculty group review in practice.
    Goh J; Clapham M
    Clin Teach; 2013 Jun; 10(3):195-6. PubMed ID: 23656684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overseas registration.
    Elgalaid T
    Br Dent J; 2008 Jul; 205(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 18617919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploration of a possible relationship between examiner stringency and personality factors in clinical assessments: a pilot study.
    Finn Y; Cantillon P; Flaherty G
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Dec; 14():1052. PubMed ID: 25551778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The objective structured clinical examination: can physician-examiners participate from a distance?
    Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S; Pugh DM; Su C; Wood T
    Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 48(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 24606627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporating patients' assessments into objective structured clinical examinations.
    Kilminster S; Roberts T; Morris P
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2007 May; 20(1):6. PubMed ID: 17647174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to get the credit for your previous learning.
    Skinner J
    NT Learn Curve; 1997 Nov; 1(9):6-8. PubMed ID: 9407841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. May student examiners be reasonable substitute examiners for faculty in an undergraduate OSCE on medical emergencies?
    Iblher P; Zupanic M; Karsten J; Brauer K
    Med Teach; 2015 Apr; 37(4):374-8. PubMed ID: 25186850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A summative, Objective, Structured, Clinical Examination in ENT used to assess postgraduate doctors after one year of ENT training, as part of the Diploma of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery.
    Drake-Lee AB; Skinner D; Hawthorne M; Clarke R;
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Oct; 123(10):1155-9. PubMed ID: 19607740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.