225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21967274)
1. Object-based control of attention is sensitive to recent experience.
Lee H; Mozer MC; Kramer AF; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):314-25. PubMed ID: 21967274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection.
Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Martella D; Casagrande M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 21688940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of instantaneous object input and past experience on object-based attention.
Ho MC; Yeh SL
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 19281963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attentional spreading in object-based attention.
Richard AM; Lee H; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):842-53. PubMed ID: 18665730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Space, object, and task selection.
Lachter J; Remington RW; Ruthruff E
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):995-1014. PubMed ID: 19525533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Age-related differences in object- and location-based inhibition of return of attention.
McCrae CS; Abrams RA
Psychol Aging; 2001 Sep; 16(3):437-49. PubMed ID: 11554522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. First come, first served? Influence of changed object configuration on object-based attention.
Lin SY; Yeh SL
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):678-87. PubMed ID: 21264692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual impairment at large eccentricity in participants treated by vigabatrin: visual, attentional or recognition deficit?
Naili F; Boucart M; Derambure P; Arndt C
Epilepsy Res; 2009 Dec; 87(2-3):213-22. PubMed ID: 19800764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention.
Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of multiple irrelevant visual events at the same spatial location on inhibition.
Visser TA; Barnes D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 19304628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of relational information in contingent capture.
Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1460-76. PubMed ID: 20919781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attentional changes during implicit learning: signal validity protects a target stimulus from the attentional blink.
Livesey EJ; Harris IM; Harris JA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):408-22. PubMed ID: 19271855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How do selected arrows guide visuospatial attention? Dissociating symbolic value and spatial proximity.
Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1314-20. PubMed ID: 20873940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural mechanisms of visual attention: object-based selection of a region in space.
Arrington CM; Carr TH; Mayer AR; Rao SM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2000; 12 Suppl 2():106-17. PubMed ID: 11506651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modulation of spatial Stroop by object-based attention but not by space-based attention.
Luo C; Lupiáñez J; Funes MJ; Fu X
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):516-30. PubMed ID: 19565432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cross-modal nonspatial repetition inhibition.
Wang L; Yue Z; Chen Q
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):867-78. PubMed ID: 22415447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory?
Becker SI
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1417-40. PubMed ID: 19045983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The path of visual attention.
Brown JM; Breitmeyer BG; Leighty KA; Denney HI
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16321354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention.
Lasaponara S; Chica AB; Lecce F; Lupianez J; Doricchi F
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 21640737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
