These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21967274)

  • 21. Personally-significant information affects performance only within the focus of attention: a direct manipulation of attention.
    Breska A; Israel M; Maoz K; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1754-67. PubMed ID: 21541809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spatial attention does improve temporal discrimination.
    Chica AB; Christie J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 19304617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Object based implicit contextual learning: a study of eye movements.
    van Asselen M; Sampaio J; Pina A; Castelo-Branco M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):297-302. PubMed ID: 21264718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Two (or three) is one too many: testing the flexibility of contextual cueing with multiple target locations.
    Zellin M; Conci M; von Mühlenen A; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2065-76. PubMed ID: 21755420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of action on visual search: behavioral response toward stimuli modifies the selection process.
    Buttaccio DR; Hahn S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1453-66. PubMed ID: 21491163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Overt and covert object-based attention.
    McCarley JS; Kramer AF; Peterson MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Dec; 9(4):751-8. PubMed ID: 12613679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The time course of attentional capture under dual-task conditions.
    Santangelo V; Botta F; Lupiáñez J; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 21258904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Object-based attention in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
    Ushitani T; Imura T; Tomonaga M
    Vision Res; 2010 Mar; 50(6):577-84. PubMed ID: 20064543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Auditory, tactile, and multisensory cues facilitate search for dynamic visual stimuli.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1654-65. PubMed ID: 20675808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Object-based attention: shifting or uncertainty?
    Drummond L; Shomstein S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1743-55. PubMed ID: 20952774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attentional orientation induced by temporarily established self-referential cues.
    Sui J; Liu CH; Wang L; Han S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):844-9. PubMed ID: 19132633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Voluntary spatial attention induces spatial facilitation and object-centered suppression.
    Lin Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):968-82. PubMed ID: 24364702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visual marking and change blindness: moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects.
    Watson DG; Kunar MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1391-405. PubMed ID: 20853998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand.
    Reed CL; Grubb JD; Steele C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):166-77. PubMed ID: 16478334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How does target duration affect object substitution masking?
    Gellatly A; Pilling M; Carter W; Guest D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1267-79. PubMed ID: 20873938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mechanisms of priming of pop-out: Stored representations or feature-gain modulations?
    Lee H; Mozer MC; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1059-71. PubMed ID: 19525537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The relationship between attentional capture and deviations in movement trajectories in a selective reaching task.
    Welsh TN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 21507363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.