These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Active reporting scheme: an example to evaluate specific adverse drug reactions. Pini LA; Sternieri E Acta Physiol Hung; 1990; 75 Suppl():237-8. PubMed ID: 2371875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Adverse drug reactions. Turner P Hum Toxicol; 1986 May; 5(3):161-2. PubMed ID: 3710492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rhode Island physicians' recognition and reporting of adverse drug reactions. Scott HD; Rosenbaum SE; Waters WJ; Colt AM; Andrews LG; Juergens JP; Faich GA R I Med J (1976); 1987 Jul; 70(7):311-6. PubMed ID: 3476980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Notifying patients of adverse drug reactions. Pane FJ; Ringer L; Ferguson L; Koshko N Am J Hosp Pharm; 1991 Feb; 48(2):236-7. PubMed ID: 2003491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of an algorithm to evaluate published reports of adverse drug reactions. Case B; Oszko MA Am J Hosp Pharm; 1991 Jan; 48(1):121-2. PubMed ID: 2000870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientific challenges in postmarketing surveillance of ocular adverse drug reactions. Fraunfelder FW; Fraunfelder FT Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):145-149. PubMed ID: 17188050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Review of Canadian pharmacist involvement in adverse drug reaction reporting. Taras-Zasowski KM; Einarson TR Can J Hosp Pharm; 1989 Jun; 42(3):105-8, 133. PubMed ID: 10318271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Drug by drug imputation of adverse effects in drug monitoring. Attempted comparison of different methods]. Lagier G; Vincens M; Lefebure B; Frelon JH Therapie; 1983; 38(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 6612666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Computerized detection of new adverse effects in drug surveillance. A proposal for the periodic use of the French data bank]. Pham E; Ventre JJ; Saddier P; Descotes J; Evreux JC Therapie; 1988 May; 43(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 3420571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Minimal information that should be found in reports about suspected adverse reactions of drugs]. Laporte JR; Lience E Med Clin (Barc); 1991 Jun; 97(2):56-7. PubMed ID: 1895784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The diagnosis of adverse medical events associated with drug treatment. Stephens MD Adverse Drug React Acute Poisoning Rev; 1987; 6(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 3303863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Research methods in drug surveillance. Engel RR; Grohmann R; Rüther E; Hippius H Pharmacopsychiatry; 2004 Mar; 37 Suppl 1():S12-5. PubMed ID: 15052510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Critical reflection on the collection and evaluation of adverse drug reaction data. Venulet J Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1985 Apr; 23 Suppl 1():S48-53. PubMed ID: 3842691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Misclassification in epidemiologic studies of adverse drug reactions using large managerial data bases. Graham DJ; Smith CR Am J Prev Med; 1988; 4(2 Suppl):15-24. PubMed ID: 3079350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Program for improving adverse drug reaction reporting. Chatas CA; Vinson BE Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Jan; 47(1):155-7. PubMed ID: 2301425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An adverse drug reaction reporting program. Wasan SM; Marshall LB Can J Hosp Pharm; 1989 Dec; 42(6):239-41. PubMed ID: 10318356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]