318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21968260)
1. Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers.
Li K
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Nov; 409(24):5493-8. PubMed ID: 21968260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Applicability of a modified MCE filter method with Button Inhalable Sampler for monitoring personal bioaerosol inhalation exposure.
Xu Z; Xu H; Yao M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 May; 20(5):2963-72. PubMed ID: 23054771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air.
Chang CW; Chou FC
Indoor Air; 2011 Aug; 21(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 21198889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols.
Yao M; Mainelis G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jul; 4(7):514-24. PubMed ID: 17538812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Personal air samplers for measuring occupational exposures to biological hazards.
Macher JM; First MW
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Feb; 45(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 6702610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chamber evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler.
Macher J; Chen B; Rao C
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):702-12. PubMed ID: 18720289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the commercial bacterial air samplers by the new bacterial aerosol generator.
Furuhashi M; Miyamae T
Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1981 Mar; 28(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 7011587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sampling of high amounts of bioaerosols using a high-volume electrostatic field sampler.
Madsen AM; Sharma AK
Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Apr; 52(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 18326871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A two-stage cyclone using microcentrifuge tubes for personal bioaerosol sampling.
Lindsley WG; Schmechel D; Chen BT
J Environ Monit; 2006 Nov; 8(11):1136-42. PubMed ID: 17075620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A field comparison of four samplers for enumerating fungal aerosols I. Sampling characteristics.
Lee KS; Bartlett KH; Brauer M; Stephens GM; Black WA; Teschke K
Indoor Air; 2004 Oct; 14(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 15330796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Field testing of new aerosol sampling method with a porous curved surface as inlet.
Hauck BC; Grinshpun SA; Reponen A; Reponen T; Willeke K; Bornschein RL
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Oct; 58(10):713-9. PubMed ID: 9342831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of high-volume air sampling equipment for viral aerosol sampling during emergency response.
Cooper C; Slagley J; Lohaus J; Escamilla E; Bliss C; Semler D; Felker D; Smith D; Ott D
J Emerg Manag; 2014; 12(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 24828912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis of air filter samples from a scrap lead smelting operation.
Harper M; Hallmark TS; Andrew ME; Bird AJ
J Environ Monit; 2004 Oct; 6(10):819-26. PubMed ID: 15480496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.
Mbareche H; Veillette M; Bilodeau GJ; Duchaine C
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integration of high volume portable aerosol-to-hydrosol sampling and qPCR in monitoring bioaerosols.
He Q; Yao M
J Environ Monit; 2011 Mar; 13(3):706-12. PubMed ID: 21258725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of portable XRF and ICP-OES analysis for lead on air filter samples from a lead ore concentrator mill and a lead-acid battery recycler.
Harper M; Pacolay B; Hintz P; Andrew ME
J Environ Monit; 2006 Mar; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 16528423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of three impactor samplers for measuring airborne bacteria and fungi concentrations.
Méheust D; Gangneux JP; Cann PL
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(8):455-9. PubMed ID: 23799861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
