BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21968341)

  • 1. A cost analysis of postoperative management in endometrial cancer patients treated by robotics versus laparoscopic approach.
    Martino MA; Shubella J; Thomas MB; Morcrette RM; Schindler J; Williams S; Boulay R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Dec; 123(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 21968341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
    Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy.
    Holtz DO; Miroshnichenko G; Finnegan MO; Chernick M; Dunton CJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 20547112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
    Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
    Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost analysis of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for early endometrial cancer.
    Scribner DR; Mannel RS; Walker JL; Johnson GA
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Dec; 75(3):460-3. PubMed ID: 10600307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?
    Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki MI; Moody JM; Garafano LL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):329-35. PubMed ID: 10985889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic-assisted surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
    Holloway RW; Ahmad S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Jan; 38(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 22136216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
    DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.
    Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-benefit analysis of laparoscopic surgery versus laparotomy for patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: experience from an institute in China.
    Lu Z; Yi X; Feng W; Ding J; Xu H; Zhou X; Hua K
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Jul; 38(7):1011-7. PubMed ID: 22487546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
    Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma.
    Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Zhang B; Sikes C; Kimball KJ; Kilgore LC; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Alvarez RD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):604-7. PubMed ID: 21658752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short- and long-term morbidity and outcomes after robotic surgery for comprehensive endometrial cancer staging.
    Backes FJ; Brudie LA; Farrell MR; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ; Bigsby GE; O'Malley D; Cohn DE; Holloway RW; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 22387522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer.
    ElSahwi KS; Hooper C; De Leon MC; Gallo TN; Ratner E; Silasi DA; Santin AD; Schwartz PE; Rutherford TJ; Azodi M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Feb; 124(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 22036203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
    Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Postoperative Pain Scores and Narcotic Use in Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Staging.
    Turner TB; Habib AS; Broadwater G; Valea FA; Fleming ND; Ehrisman JA; Di Santo N; Havrilesky LJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1004-10. PubMed ID: 25967934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.