These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21968726)

  • 1. Effect of pregnancy on the genetic evaluation of dairy cattle.
    Pereira RJ; Santana ML; Bignardi AB; Verneque RS; El Faro L; Albuquerque LG
    Genet Mol Res; 2011 Sep; 10(3):2190-201. PubMed ID: 21968726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of pregnancy on production traits of Canadian Holstein cows.
    Bohmanova J; Jamrozik J; Miglior F
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jun; 92(6):2947-59. PubMed ID: 19448027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic evaluation of lactation persistency for five breeds of dairy cattle.
    Cole JB; Null DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2248-58. PubMed ID: 19389984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phenotypic analysis of pregnancy effect on milk, fat, and protein yields of Canadian Ayrshire, Jersey, Brown Swiss, and Guernsey breeds.
    Loker S; Miglior F; Bohmanova J; Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Mar; 92(3):1300-12. PubMed ID: 19233823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genotype x environment interaction for milk yield in Holsteins using Luxembourg and Tunisian populations.
    Hammami H; Rekik B; Soyeurt H; Bastin C; Stoll J; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Sep; 91(9):3661-71. PubMed ID: 18765624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic evaluation of bulls and cows with single- and multiple-country test-day models.
    Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jun; 85(6):1617-22. PubMed ID: 12146495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic markers for lactation persistency in primiparous Australian dairy cows.
    Pryce JE; Haile-Mariam M; Verbyla K; Bowman PJ; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 May; 93(5):2202-14. PubMed ID: 20412936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Body condition scores and dairy form evaluations as indicators of days open in US Holsteins.
    Dechow CD; Rogers GW; Klei L; Lawlor TJ; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Oct; 87(10):3534-41. PubMed ID: 15377633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short communication: effect of preadjusting test-day yields for stage of pregnancy on variance component estimation in Canadian Ayrshires.
    Loker S; Miglior F; Bohmanova J; Schaeffer LR; Jamrozik J; Kistemaker G
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2270-5. PubMed ID: 19389986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Milk yield persistency in Brazilian Gyr cattle based on a random regression model.
    Pereira RJ; Verneque RS; Lopes PS; Santana ML; Lagrotta MR; Torres RA; Vercesi Filho AE; Machado MA
    Genet Mol Res; 2012 Jun; 11(2):1599-609. PubMed ID: 22782579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of test day models on the estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values for dairy yield traits.
    Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 Apr; 78(4):929-38. PubMed ID: 7790586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle using test day yields and random regression model.
    Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR; Dekkers JC
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 Jun; 80(6):1217-26. PubMed ID: 9201594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Approaches to estimating daily yield from single milk testing schemes and use of a.m.-p.m. records in test-day model genetic evaluation in dairy cattle.
    Liu Z; Reents R; Reinhardt F; Kuwan K
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Nov; 83(11):2672-82. PubMed ID: 11104288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of test-day records beyond three hundred five days for estimation of three hundred five-day breeding values for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holsteins.
    Bohmanova J; Miglior F; Jamrozik J
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5314-25. PubMed ID: 19762849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle with test-day models with autoregressive covariance structures and with a 305-d model.
    Sawalha RM; Keown JF; Kachman SD; Van Vleck LD
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3346-53. PubMed ID: 16107425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic evaluation and best prediction of lactation persistency.
    Cole JB; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Jul; 89(7):2722-8. PubMed ID: 16772591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental sensitivity for milk yield in Luxembourg and Tunisian Holsteins by herd management level.
    Hammami H; Rekik B; Bastin C; Soyeurt H; Bormann J; Stoll J; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4604-12. PubMed ID: 19700723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of random regression models with Legendre polynomials and linear splines for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holstein cows.
    Bohmanova J; Miglior F; Jamrozik J; Misztal I; Sullivan PG
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Sep; 91(9):3627-38. PubMed ID: 18765621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of genotype by environment interaction for milk yield traits in first lactation of Simmental cattle.
    Gerber A; Krogmeier D; Emmerling R; Götz KU
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Dec; 125(6):382-9. PubMed ID: 19134073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
    Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.