These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21968785)

  • 21. Working memory costs of task switching.
    Liefooghe B; Barrouillet P; Vandierendonck A; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. It is time to integrate: the temporal dynamics of object motion and texture motion integration in multiple object tracking.
    Huff M; Papenmeier F
    Vision Res; 2013 Jan; 76():25-30. PubMed ID: 23079637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of sequence order in determining view canonicality for novel wire-frame objects.
    Balas BJ; Sinha P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):712-23. PubMed ID: 19429954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What impairs subitizing in cerebral palsied children?
    Arp S; Fagard J
    Dev Psychobiol; 2005 Jul; 47(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 15959897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: facilitated change detection for persisting objects.
    Flombaum JI; Scholl BJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):840-53. PubMed ID: 16846283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of eye movements in subitizing and counting.
    Watson DG; Maylor EA; Bruce LA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1389-99. PubMed ID: 18085951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing.
    Trick LM; Pylyshyn ZW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Apr; 19(2):331-51. PubMed ID: 8473843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Consolidation of statistical information of multiple objects in working memory.
    Baijal S; Srinivasan N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1733-41. PubMed ID: 21607816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: coordinate transformations in object recognition.
    Graf M; Kaping D; Bülthoff HH
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 15733202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location.
    van Dam WO; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1184-92. PubMed ID: 20718565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. View-invariant object recognition ability develops after discrimination, not mere exposure, at several viewing angles.
    Yamashita W; Wang G; Tanaka K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 31(2):327-35. PubMed ID: 20074222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism.
    Alvarez GA; Franconeri SL
    J Vis; 2007 Oct; 7(13):14.1-10. PubMed ID: 17997642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spatial and visuospatial working memory tests predict performance in classic multiple-object tracking in young adults, but nonspatial measures of the executive do not.
    Trick LM; Mutreja R; Hunt K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):300-11. PubMed ID: 22076680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attention modulates perception of transparent motion.
    Felisberti FM; Zanker JM
    Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(19):2587-99. PubMed ID: 16022880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Position representations lag behind targets in multiple object tracking.
    Howard CJ; Masom D; Holcombe AO
    Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(17):1907-19. PubMed ID: 21762715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lack of set size effects in spatial updating: Evidence for offline updating.
    Hodgson E; Waller D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):854-66. PubMed ID: 16822153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What was where? Memory for object locations.
    Postma A; De Haan EH
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Feb; 49(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 8920102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Binding facilitates attention switching within working memory.
    Bao M; Li ZH; Zhang DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):959-69. PubMed ID: 17723072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The relationship between object files and conscious perception.
    Mitroff SR; Scholl BJ; Wynn K
    Cognition; 2005 May; 96(1):67-92. PubMed ID: 15833307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inhibitory tagging in visual search: only in difficult search are items tagged individually.
    Hulleman J
    Vision Res; 2010 Sep; 50(20):2069-79. PubMed ID: 20673776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.