BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21968821)

  • 21. Results of the 2010 National Radiation Protection Institute intercomparison of radon and its short-lived decay product continuous monitors.
    Jílek K; Marušiaková M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 May; 145(2-3):273-9. PubMed ID: 21471124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How to assess the sensitivity and related uncertainty of a new solid state passive thoron measuring device.
    Calamosca M; Penzo S
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 May; 67(5):854-9. PubMed ID: 19231227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Detection properties of a measuring system for a continuous soil radon concentrations monitoring.
    Fronka A; Moucka L; Jerábek M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 18407971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Workplace monitoring for exposures to radon and to other natural sources in Europe: integration of monitoring for internal and external exposures.
    Lopez MA; Currivan L; Falk R; Olko P; Wernli C; Castellani CM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(1):121-39. PubMed ID: 15574988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of efficiency calibration parameters of the LR-115 radon detector.
    Mireles F; Dávila JI; García ML; Pinedo JL; López H
    Health Phys; 2010 May; 98 Suppl 2():S63-8. PubMed ID: 20386194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intercomparison exercise of the PTB, BfS, MPA and PSI calibration facilities for radon gas concentration.
    Butterweck G; Schuler C; Paul A; Honig A; Dersch R; Schmidt V; Hamel P; Buchröder H; Rox A; Herzog W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 98(2):219-22. PubMed ID: 11926372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Radon exposure assessment and dosimetry applied to epidemiology and risk estimation.
    Puskin JS; James AC
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):193-208. PubMed ID: 16808608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Factors affecting use of CR-39 surface monitor technology to estimate past exposure to indoor radon.
    Mahaffey JA; Parkhurst MA; Hui TE; Brownson RC; Alavanja MC
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1996; 6(4):425-37. PubMed ID: 9087863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality assurance and quality control methodologies used within the Austrian UV monitoring network.
    Mario B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(4):359-62. PubMed ID: 15550702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effective dose assessment for workers in caves in the Czech Republic: experiments with passive radon detectors.
    Thinová L; Burian I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 18440960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radon measurements--discussion of error estimates for selected methods.
    Zhukovsky M; Onischenko A; Bastrikov V
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):816-20. PubMed ID: 19822441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Standards and experience in radon measurement and regulation of radon mitigation in Austria.
    Maringer FJ; Kaineder H; Nadschläger E; Sperker S
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1644-9. PubMed ID: 18513983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A method for the determination of thoron and thoron progeny concentration at workplaces and thoron concentration in calibration chambers.
    Falk R; Akerblom G; Nyblom L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):444-8. PubMed ID: 18718963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of environmental changes on integrating radon detectors: results of an intercomparison exercise.
    Vargas A; Ortega X
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(4):529-36. PubMed ID: 17077091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of natural background dose rates for residents of the Amargosa Valley, NV, to those in Leadville, CO, and the states of Colorado and Nevada.
    Moeller DW; Sun LS
    Health Phys; 2006 Oct; 91(4):338-53. PubMed ID: 16966877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Blind testing of commercially available short-term radon detectors.
    Sun K; Budd G; McLemore S; Field RW
    Health Phys; 2008 Jun; 94(6):548-57. PubMed ID: 18469588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Application of an equilibrium-based model for diffusion barrier charcoal canisters in a small volume non-steady state radon chamber.
    Lehnert AL; Thompson KH; Kearfott KJ
    Health Phys; 2011 Feb; 100(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 21399428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Anomalous results with the widely used NRPB/SSI-type passive radon dosemeter.
    Paridaens J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec; 142(2-4):347-53. PubMed ID: 20858675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Calibration of an electrostatic chamber for thoron measurements in exhaled breath.
    Sathyabama N; Eappen KP; Mayya YS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 16091401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Elevation correction factors for E-PERM radon monitors.
    Kotrappa P; Stieff LR
    Health Phys; 1992 Jan; 62(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 1727416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.