These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21968987)

  • 1. UK Parliament comments on peer review.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2011 Oct; 13(10):1153. PubMed ID: 21968987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deception in scientific research.
    Woolf PK
    Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NIH misconduct probes draw legal complaints.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 Jul; 249(4966):240-2. PubMed ID: 2374923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correcting the scientific record.
    Nat Chem Biol; 2008 Jul; 4(7):381. PubMed ID: 18560424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From the Editors' Desk: Truth Rules, or the Upside of Bureaucracy.
    Asch SM
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Jul; 33(7):979. PubMed ID: 29736751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Updates to policies and procedures related to potential scientific and academic misconduct in the journals of the American Diabetes Association.
    Kohler CS;
    Diabetes; 2012 Jan; 61(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 22187374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beautification and fraud.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2006 Feb; 8(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 16450003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
    Kline S
    J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigator labeled fraud has last published word: 'I'm sorry.
    Med World News; 1983 Jun; 24(12):40-1. PubMed ID: 11645491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Will the UK cope?
    Horton R
    Lancet; 1997 Jul; 350(9073):234. PubMed ID: 9242798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
    Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
    IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Federal agencies can do more to ensure correction of the literature when research misconduct is found.
    Parrish DM
    Account Res; 2018; 25(6):370-372. PubMed ID: 30064271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should Failure to Disclose Significant Financial Conflicts of Interest Be Considered Research Misconduct?
    Botkin JR
    JAMA; 2018 Dec; 320(22):2307-2308. PubMed ID: 30422234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correcting the record.
    Frank S
    CMAJ; 2014 Jul; 186(10):779. PubMed ID: 25002743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
    Fox MF; Braxton JM
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regulating academic-industrial research relationships--solving problems or stifling progress?
    Stossel TP
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Sep; 353(10):1060-5. PubMed ID: 16148294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Global trend: more science, more fraud.
    Altman L; Broad WJ
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Dec; ():F1, F6. PubMed ID: 16450465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fraud in biomedical science.
    Satyanarayana K
    Natl Med J India; 1992; 5(3):134-6. PubMed ID: 1304290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When good scientists turn bad.
    Roman MB
    Discover; 1988 Apr; 9(4):50-55, 57-58. PubMed ID: 11653808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.