BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

454 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21969343)

  • 1. Clinical decision rules for excluding pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.
    Lucassen W; Geersing GJ; Erkens PM; Reitsma JB; Moons KG; Büller H; van Weert HC
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(7):448-60. PubMed ID: 21969343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism in Primary Care: Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of "Gestalt" and the Wells Rule.
    Hendriksen JM; Lucassen WA; Erkens PM; Stoffers HE; van Weert HC; Büller HR; Hoes AW; Moons KG; Geersing GJ
    Ann Fam Med; 2016 May; 14(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 27184993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of 4 clinical decision rules in the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study.
    Douma RA; Mos IC; Erkens PM; Nizet TA; Durian MF; Hovens MM; van Houten AA; Hofstee HM; Klok FA; ten Cate H; Ullmann EF; Büller HR; Kamphuisen PW; Huisman MV;
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 154(11):709-18. PubMed ID: 21646554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside with low pre-test probability and D-dimer: safety and clinical utility of 4 methods to assign pre-test probability.
    Carrier M; Wells PS; Rodger MA
    Thromb Res; 2006; 117(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 15893807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical decision rule and D-dimer have lower clinical utility to exclude pulmonary embolism in cancer patients. Explanations and potential ameliorations.
    Douma RA; van Sluis GL; Kamphuisen PW; Söhne M; Leebeek FW; Bossuyt PM; Büller HR
    Thromb Haemost; 2010 Oct; 104(4):831-6. PubMed ID: 20664894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in outpatients with suspected DVT or PE by the sequential use of clinical score: a sensitive quantitative D-dimer test and noninvasive diagnostic tools.
    Michiels JJ; Gadisseur A; van der Planken M; Schroyens W; De Maeseneer M; Hermsen JT; Trienekens PH; Hoogsteden H; Pattynama PM
    Semin Vasc Med; 2005 Nov; 5(4):351-64. PubMed ID: 16302156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Different accuracies of rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent, turbidimetric, and agglutination D-dimer assays for thrombosis exclusion: impact on diagnostic work-ups of outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
    Michiels JJ; Gadisseur A; van der Planken M; Schroyens W; De Maeseneer M; Hermsen JT; Trienekens PH; Hoogsteden H; Pattynama PM
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2006 Oct; 32(7):678-93. PubMed ID: 17024595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. VIDAS D-dimer in combination with clinical pre-test probability to rule out pulmonary embolism. A systematic review of management outcome studies.
    Carrier M; Righini M; Djurabi RK; Huisman MV; Perrier A; Wells PS; Rodger M; Wuillemin WA; Le Gal G
    Thromb Haemost; 2009 May; 101(5):886-92. PubMed ID: 19404542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of the Wells clinical prediction rule for pulmonary embolism in older ambulatory adults.
    Schouten HJ; Geersing GJ; Oudega R; van Delden JJ; Moons KG; Koek HL
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2014 Nov; 62(11):2136-41. PubMed ID: 25366538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Exclusion of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism using clinical decision rules and D-dimer tests].
    Mos IC; Tan M; Klok FA; Kamphuisen PW; Huisman MV
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A2054. PubMed ID: 21176247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wells Rule and d-Dimer Testing to Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Individual-Patient Data Meta-analysis.
    van Es N; van der Hulle T; van Es J; den Exter PL; Douma RA; Goekoop RJ; Mos IC; Galipienzo J; Kamphuisen PW; Huisman MV; Klok FA; Büller HR; Bossuyt PM
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Aug; 165(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 27182696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The original and simplified Wells rules and age-adjusted D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
    van Es N; Kraaijpoel N; Klok FA; Huisman MV; Den Exter PL; Mos IC; Galipienzo J; Büller HR; Bossuyt PM
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Apr; 15(4):678-684. PubMed ID: 28106338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The combination of four different clinical decision rules and an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off increases the number of patients in whom acute pulmonary embolism can safely be excluded.
    van Es J; Mos I; Douma R; Erkens P; Durian M; Nizet T; van Houten A; Hofstee H; ten Cate H; Ullmann E; Büller H; Huisman M; Kamphuisen PW
    Thromb Haemost; 2012 Jan; 107(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 22072293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Qualitative point-of-care D-dimer testing compared with quantitative D-dimer testing in excluding pulmonary embolism in primary care.
    Lucassen WA; Erkens PM; Geersing GJ; Büller HR; Moons KG; Stoffers HE; van Weert HC
    J Thromb Haemost; 2015 Jun; 13(6):1004-9. PubMed ID: 25845618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (the PERC rule) combined with low clinical probability in high prevalence population.
    Penaloza A; Verschuren F; Dambrine S; Zech F; Thys F; Roy PM
    Thromb Res; 2012 May; 129(5):e189-93. PubMed ID: 22424852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the unstructured clinician estimate of pretest probability for pulmonary embolism to the Canadian score and the Charlotte rule: a prospective observational study.
    Runyon MS; Webb WB; Jones AE; Kline JA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Jul; 12(7):587-93. PubMed ID: 15995088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of high pretest probability patients undergoing d-dimer testing for pulmonary embolism: a pilot study.
    Kabrhel C
    J Emerg Med; 2008 Nov; 35(4):373-7. PubMed ID: 18343077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrospective validation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule in 'PE unlikely' patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
    Crane S; Jaconelli T; Eragat M
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2018 Jun; 25(3):185-190. PubMed ID: 28002070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical Decision Rules for Pulmonary Embolism in Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.
    Bass AR; Fields KG; Goto R; Turissini G; Dey S; Russell LA
    Thromb Haemost; 2017 Nov; 117(11):2176-2185. PubMed ID: 29044295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Value of quantitative D-dimer assays in identifying pulmonary embolism: implications from a sequential decision model.
    Duriseti RS; Shachter RD; Brandeau ML
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Jul; 13(7):755-66. PubMed ID: 16723725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.