135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21969400)
21. Current and future trends in multimodality imaging of coronary artery disease.
Alexanderson-Rosas E; Guinto-Nishimura GY; Cruz-Mendoza JR; Oropeza-Aguilar M; De La Fuente-Mancera JC; Barrero-Mier AF; Monroy-Gonzalez A; Juarez-Orozco LE; Cano-Zarate R; Meave-Gonzalez A
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2015 Jun; 13(6):715-31. PubMed ID: 25912725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Positron-emitting myocardial blood flow tracers and clinical potential.
Schindler TH
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 57(6):588-606. PubMed ID: 25637500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function: Dynamic Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Positron Emission Tomography, Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Feher A; Sinusas AJ
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 28794138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Integration of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion imaging.
Blankstein R; Di Carli MF
Nat Rev Cardiol; 2010 Apr; 7(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 20212502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Nuclear cardiac imaging between implementation and globalization: The key role of integration.
Cuocolo A; Nappi C; Acampa W; Petretta M
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Jun; 28(3):793-795. PubMed ID: 33939159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [The role of advanced cardiac imaging methods in coronary artery disease].
Kiraç S
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2008 Jul; 8 Suppl 1():1-4. PubMed ID: 18611832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT, CT and MR compared to fractional flow reserve as reference standard.
Yang Z; Zheng H; Zhou T; Yang LF; Hu XF; Peng ZH; Jiang YZ; Li M; Sun G
Int J Cardiol; 2015; 190():103-5. PubMed ID: 25920018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Nuclear perfusion imaging for functional evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: the future is now.
Mc Ardle B; Ziadi MC; Ruddy TD; Beanlands RS
Future Cardiol; 2012 Jul; 8(4):603-22. PubMed ID: 22871198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: the further improvements of an excellent tool.
Cuocolo A; Petretta M; Acampa W; De Falco T
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Apr; 54(2):129-44. PubMed ID: 20588210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Varying prognostic significance of "ischemic ST depression" during vasodilator stress testing in patients with normal SPECT/PET myocardial perfusion imaging.
Piotrowicz R
Cardiol J; 2009; 16(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 19387955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Highlights from the Updated Joint ASNC/SNMMI PET Myocardial Perfusion and Metabolism Clinical Imaging Guidelines.
Dilsizian V
J Nucl Med; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1327-8. PubMed ID: 27199358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Prognostic Implications of Discordant Results of Myocardial Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography and Exercise ECG Test in Patients with Stable Angina.
Kowalczyk E; Filipiak-Strzecka D; Hamala P; Śmiech N; Kasprzak JD; Kuśmierek J; Płachcińska A; Lipiec P
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 26771967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Noninvasive diagnosis and prognosis assessment in chronic coronary artery disease: stress testing with and without imaging perspective.
Gibbons RJ
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Nov; 1(3):257-69; discussion 269. PubMed ID: 19808550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Blood Flow with SPECT.
Petretta M; Storto G; Pellegrino T; Bonaduce D; Cuocolo A
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 57(6):607-14. PubMed ID: 25560327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nuclear cardiology: finally a one-stop shop for diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of coronary artery disease.
Cerqueira MD
Clin Cardiol; 2006 Sep; 29(9 Suppl 1):I26-33. PubMed ID: 17009575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography.
Arumugam P; Tout D; Tonge C
Br Med Bull; 2013; 107():87-100. PubMed ID: 23966422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Optimal imaging strategies to assess coronary blood flow and risk for patients with coronary artery disease.
Jerosch-Herold M; Kwong RY
Curr Opin Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 23(6):599-606. PubMed ID: 18830076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Hybrid Imaging in Ischemic Heart Disease.
Giannopoulos AA; Gaemperli O
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2018 May; 71(5):382-390. PubMed ID: 29329818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion defects are associated with an increased risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and sudden cardiac death.
Piccini JP; Horton JR; Shaw LK; Al-Khatib SM; Lee KL; Iskandrian AE; Borges-Neto S
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Nov; 1(3):180-8. PubMed ID: 19808541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Understanding the heart: CT and MRI for coronary heart disease.
Sirineni GK; Stillman AE
J Thorac Imaging; 2007 Feb; 22(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 17325582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
