262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21969429)
1. Femoral revision with the Wagner tapered stem: a ten- to 15-year follow-up study.
Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I; Braggion M; Bartolozzi P
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Oct; 93(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 21969429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term results of femoral revision with the Wagner Self-Locking stem.
Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I
Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():243-50. PubMed ID: 24081844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The S-ROM hydroxyapatite proximally-coated modular femoral stem in revision hip replacement: results of 397 hips at a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Imbuldeniya AM; Walter WK; Zicat BA; Walter WL
Bone Joint J; 2014 Jun; 96-B(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 24891571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.
Sandiford NA; Garbuz DS; Masri BA; Duncan CP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):186-192. PubMed ID: 27672012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proximal femoral replacement in contemporary revision total hip arthroplasty for severe femoral bone loss: a review of outcomes.
Viste A; Perry KI; Taunton MJ; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2017 Mar; 99-B(3):325-329. PubMed ID: 28249971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mid term results with the curved modular tapered, fluted titanium Revitan stem in revision hip replacement.
Fink B; Urbansky K; Schuster P
Bone Joint J; 2014 Jul; 96-B(7):889-95. PubMed ID: 24986941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term outcomes of cementless femoral stem revision with the Wagner cone prosthesis.
Park KS; Jin SY; Lim JH; Yoon TR
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Jun; 16(1):375. PubMed ID: 34116695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Monoblock Splined Tapered Grit-Blasted Titanium Stem.
Hellman MD; Kearns SM; Bohl DD; Haughom BD; Levine BR
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Dec; 32(12):3698-3703. PubMed ID: 28803814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of femoral struts and impacted cancellous bone allograft in patients with severe femoral bone loss who undergo revision total hip replacement: a three- to nine-year follow-up.
Buttaro MA; Costantini J; Comba F; Piccaluga F
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 22323680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Synergy cementless femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 15 years.
De Martino I; De Santis V; D'Apolito R; Sculco PK; Cross MB; Gasparini G
Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan; 99-B(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 28053254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Femoral impaction bone allografting with an Exeter cemented collarless, polished, tapered stem in revision hip replacement: a mean follow-up of 10.5 years.
Wraighte PJ; Howard PW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Aug; 90(8):1000-4. PubMed ID: 18669953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.
Watts CD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2045-53. PubMed ID: 25502478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term survivorship of a monoblock long cementless stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Herry Y; Viste A; Bothorel H; Desmarchelier R; Fessy MH
Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2279-2284. PubMed ID: 30276449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with and without extended trochanteric osteotomy.
Park YS; Moon YW; Lim SJ
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):993-9. PubMed ID: 17920471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term outcomes with the REDAPT monolithic, tapered, fluted, grit-blasted, forged titanium revision femoral stem.
Gabor JA; Padilla JA; Feng JE; Schnaser E; Lutes WB; Park KJ; Incavo S; Vigdorchik J; Schwarzkopf R
Bone Joint J; 2020 Feb; 102-B(2):191-197. PubMed ID: 32009430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Bone reconstruction, leg length discrepancy, and dislocation rate in 52 Wagner revision total hip arthroplasties at 44-month follow-up].
Boisgard S; Moreau PE; Tixier H; Levai JP
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Apr; 87(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 11319426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component.
McLaughlin JR; Lee KR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jun; 90(6):1290-6. PubMed ID: 18519323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with extensive proximal femoral bone loss using a fluted tapered modular femoral component.
Amanatullah DF; Howard JL; Siman H; Trousdale RT; Mabry TM; Berry DJ
Bone Joint J; 2015 Mar; 97-B(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 25737513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
