These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21969698)
41. SCC-Ag, lymph node metastases and sentinel node procedure in early stage squamous cell cervical cancer. van de Lande J; Davelaar EM; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Water TJ; Berkhof J; van Baal WM; Kenemans P; Verheijen RH Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jan; 112(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 19007978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Laparoscopic detection of sentinel lymph nodes using blue dye in women with cervical and endometrial cancer. Holub Z; Jabor A; Lukac J; Kliment L Med Sci Monit; 2004 Oct; 10(10):CR587-91. PubMed ID: 15448599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Application of apparent diffusion coefficient values derived from diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing different sized metastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancers. Zhang A; Song J; Ma Z; Chen T Acta Radiol; 2020 Jun; 61(6):848-855. PubMed ID: 31615267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. Yang WT; Lam WW; Yu MY; Cheung TH; Metreweli C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):759-66. PubMed ID: 10954463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting lymphovascular invasion in invasive cervical cancer. Yang W; Qiang JW; Tian HP; Chen B; Wang AJ; Zhao JG J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 45(6):1771-1779. PubMed ID: 27859961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Differentiating metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancer patients using monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Wu Q; Zheng D; Shi L; Liu M; Wang M; Shi D Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5272-5279. PubMed ID: 28534163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Diagnostic Value of Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Metastatic Neck Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Cancer: A Sample of Iranian Patient. Alamolhoda F; Faeghi F; Bakhshandeh M; Ahmadi A; Sanei Taheri M; Aabbasi S Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Jun; 20(6):1789-1795. PubMed ID: 31244301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Impact of the ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes on the survival of early-stage cervical cancer patients. Metindir J; Bilir G Onkologie; 2009 Mar; 32(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 19295248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension. deSouza NM; Dina R; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16427688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Intraoperative lymphatic mapping in cervix cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy: A pilot study. O'Boyle JD; Coleman RL; Bernstein SG; Lifshitz S; Muller CY; Miller DS Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 11063651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Risk factors and prognosis of node-positive cervical carcinoma]. Feng SY; Zhang YN; Liu JG Ai Zheng; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1261-6. PubMed ID: 16219145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Evaluation of patients after extraperitoneal lymph node dissection for cervical cancer. Denschlag D; Gabriel B; Mueller-Lantzsch C; Tempfer C; Henne K; Gitsch G; Hasenburg A Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):658-64. PubMed ID: 15721408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The performance of the node reporting and data system 1.0 (Node-RADS) and DWI-MRI in staging patients with cervical carcinoma according to the new FIGO classification (2018). Ninkova RV; Calabrese A; Curti F; Riccardi S; Gennarini M; Miceli V; Cupertino A; Di Donato V; Pernazza A; Rizzo SM; Panebianco V; Catalano C; Manganaro L Radiol Med; 2024 Jul; 129(7):1062-1075. PubMed ID: 38730037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Uterine cervical carcinoma: evaluation of pelvic lymph node metastasis with MR imaging. Kim SH; Kim SC; Choi BI; Han MC Radiology; 1994 Mar; 190(3):807-11. PubMed ID: 8115631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. Rockall AG; Sohaib SA; Harisinghani MG; Babar SA; Singh N; Jeyarajah AR; Oram DH; Jacobs IJ; Shepherd JH; Reznek RH J Clin Oncol; 2005 Apr; 23(12):2813-21. PubMed ID: 15837995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Can preoperative MRI accurately evaluate nodal and parametrial invasion in early stage cervical cancer? Chung HH; Kang SB; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Lee HP Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 May; 37(5):370-5. PubMed ID: 17556538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Histological features of lymph node metastasis in patients with biliary tract cancer. Morimoto H; Ajiki T; Ueda T; Sawa H; Fujita T; Matsumoto I; Yasuda T; Fujino Y; Kuroda Y; Ku Y J Surg Oncol; 2008 Apr; 97(5):423-7. PubMed ID: 18176913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Clinical study of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early uterine cervical carcinoma. Ying WH; Thakur B Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2005; 3(4):324-6. PubMed ID: 16449829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. One-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) for the application of sentinel node concept in gastric cancer. Yaguchi Y; Sugasawa H; Tsujimoto H; Takata H; Nakabayashi K; Ichikura T; Ono S; Hiraki S; Sakamoto N; Horio T; Kumano I; Otomo Y; Mochizuki H; Yamamoto J; Hase K Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):2289-96. PubMed ID: 21301968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]