These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
695 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21969709)
1. Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer. Hahn S; Heusner T; Kümmel S; Köninger A; Nagarajah J; Müller S; Boy C; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Stahl A Acta Radiol; 2011 Nov; 52(9):1009-14. PubMed ID: 21969709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. "One-stop-shop" staging: should we prefer FDG-PET/CT or MRI for the detection of bone metastases? Heusner T; Gölitz P; Hamami M; Eberhardt W; Esser S; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 78(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 19945240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer. Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients. Bruckmann NM; Kirchner J; Umutlu L; Fendler WP; Seifert R; Herrmann K; Bittner AK; Hoffmann O; Mohrmann S; Antke C; Schimmöller L; Ingenwerth M; Breuckmann K; Stang A; Buchbender C; Antoch G; Sawicki LM Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8714-8724. PubMed ID: 33912991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT with (99m)Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in cancer patients. Ozülker T; Küçüköz Uzun A; Ozülker F; Ozpaçac T Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Jun; 31(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 20224457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients in the PET/CT era: Do we still need the bone scan? Caglar M; Kupik O; Karabulut E; Høilund-Carlsen PF Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2016; 35(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 26514321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What Is the Comparative Ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MDP Skeletal Scintigraphy, and Whole-body MRI as a Staging Investigation to Detect Skeletal Metastases in Patients with Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma? Aryal A; Kumar VS; Shamim SA; Gamanagatti S; Khan SA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 479(8):1768-1779. PubMed ID: 33635285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 99 m-Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy and 18 F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of skeletal metastases. Chang CY; Gill CM; Joseph Simeone F; Taneja AK; Huang AJ; Torriani M; Bredella MA Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 25533313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic performance of [18F] FDG PET-CT compared to bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in lung cancer patients. Rodrigues M; Stark H; Rendl G; Rettenbacher L; Datz L; Studnicka M; Pirich C Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Mar; 60(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 26844431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of bone metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients: comparison of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), whole-body MR imaging without and with DWI, whole-body FDG-PET/CT, and bone scintigraphy. Takenaka D; Ohno Y; Matsumoto K; Aoyama N; Onishi Y; Koyama H; Nogami M; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Sugimura K J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Aug; 30(2):298-308. PubMed ID: 19629984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer: which one is the best?--a meta-analysis. Liu T; Xu JY; Xu W; Bai YR; Yan WL; Yang HL Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2011 Jun; 23(5):350-8. PubMed ID: 21094027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer staging in a single session: whole-body PET/CT mammography. Heusner TA; Kuemmel S; Umutlu L; Koeninger A; Freudenberg LS; Hauth EA; Kimmig KR; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G J Nucl Med; 2008 Aug; 49(8):1215-22. PubMed ID: 18632831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of CE-FDG-PET/CT with CE-FDG-PET/MR in the evaluation of osseous metastases in breast cancer patients. Catalano OA; Nicolai E; Rosen BR; Luongo A; Catalano M; Iannace C; Guimaraes A; Vangel MG; Mahmood U; Soricelli A; Salvatore M Br J Cancer; 2015 Apr; 112(9):1452-60. PubMed ID: 25871331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Supplemental value of diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) technique to whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in detection of bone metastases from thyroid cancer. Sakurai Y; Kawai H; Iwano S; Ito S; Ogawa H; Naganawa S J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 57(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 23721138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI compared with (18)F-NaF PET/CT for detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate carcinoma. Mosavi F; Johansson S; Sandberg DT; Turesson I; Sörensen J; Ahlström H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1114-20. PubMed ID: 23096187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and SPECT/low-dose computerized tomography did not increase sensitivity or specificity compared to planar bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in advanced breast cancer. Haraldsen A; Bluhme H; Røhl L; Pedersen EM; Jensen AB; Hansen EB; Nellemann H; Rasmussen F; Morsing A Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2016 Jan; 36(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 25257661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the diagnostic and prognostic values of 99mTc-MDP-planar bone scintigraphy, 131I-SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer. Qiu ZL; Xue YL; Song HJ; Luo QY Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Dec; 33(12):1232-42. PubMed ID: 23111353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is (99m)Tc-MDP whole body bone scintigraphy adjuvant to (18)F-FDG-PET for the detection of skeletal metastases? Sahin E; Zincirkeser S; Akcan AB; Elboga U J BUON; 2014; 19(1):291-6. PubMed ID: 24659678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of 18 FDG PET-CT and bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients. A meta-analysis. Rong J; Wang S; Ding Q; Yun M; Zheng Z; Ye S Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 22(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 23726506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]