These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21969998)
1. Comparing approaches to causal inference for longitudinal data: inverse probability weighting versus propensity scores. Ertefaie A; Stephens DA Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 14. PubMed ID: 21969998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Generalized Bootstrap Procedure of the Standard Error and Confidence Interval Estimation for Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting. Li T; Lawson J Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(2):251-265. PubMed ID: 37724449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores in Estimating Counterfactual Survival Functions via the Overlap Weights. Cheng C; Li F; Thomas LE; Li FF Am J Epidemiol; 2022 May; 191(6):1140-1151. PubMed ID: 35238335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study. Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment. Alam S; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1690-1702. PubMed ID: 30586681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes. Austin PC; Stuart EA Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation. Waernbaum I Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-step estimation in ratio-of-mediator-probability weighted causal mediation analysis. Bein E; Deutsch J; Hong G; Porter KE; Qin X; Yang C Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(8):1304-1324. PubMed ID: 29322536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel approach for propensity score matching and stratification for multiple treatments: Application to an electronic health record-derived study. Brown DW; DeSantis SM; Greene TJ; Maroufy V; Yaseen A; Wu H; Williams G; Swartz MD Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(17):2308-2323. PubMed ID: 32297677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used? Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Austin PC; Stuart EA Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(28):3661-79. PubMed ID: 26238958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal mean weighting through stratification: a generalized method for evaluating multivalued and multiple treatments with nonexperimental data. Hong G Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 21843003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting. Linden A J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using Propensity Scores for Causal Inference: Pitfalls and Tips. Shiba K; Kawahara T J Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):457-463. PubMed ID: 34121051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the performance of the generalized propensity score for estimating the effect of quantitative or continuous exposures on binary outcomes. Austin PC Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(11):1874-1894. PubMed ID: 29508424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Models for the propensity score that contemplate the positivity assumption and their application to missing data and causality. Molina J; Sued M; Valdora M Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(24):3503-3518. PubMed ID: 29873100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Data-Adaptive Selection of the Propensity Score Truncation Level for Inverse-Probability-Weighted and Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimators of Marginal Point Treatment Effects. Gruber S; Phillips RV; Lee H; van der Laan MJ Am J Epidemiol; 2022 Aug; 191(9):1640-1651. PubMed ID: 35512316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving Inverse Probability Weighting by Post-calibrating Its Propensity Scores. Gutman R; Karavani E; Shimoni Y Epidemiology; 2024 Jul; 35(4):473-480. PubMed ID: 38619218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use and reporting of inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting for multicategory treatments in medical research: a systematic review. Bettega F; Mendelson M; Leyrat C; Bailly S J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; 170():111338. PubMed ID: 38556101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]