428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21970521)
1. Phalangeal densitometry compared with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of bone mineral density in elderly women.
Dhainaut A; Rohde G; Hoff M; Syversen U; Haugeberg G
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Dec; 20(12):1789-95. PubMed ID: 21970521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ability of hand digital X-ray radiogrammetry to identify middle-aged and elderly women with reduced bone density, as assessed by femoral neck dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Dhainaut A; Rohde GE; Syversen U; Johnsen V; Haugeberg G
J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 21029976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Osteoporosis case finding in the general practice: phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry with and without risk factors for osteoporosis to select postmenopausal women eligible for lumbar spine and hip densitometry.
Gasser KM; Mueller C; Zwahlen M; Kaufmann M; Fuchs G; Perrelet R; Abetel G; Bürgi U; Lippuner K
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Nov; 16(11):1353-62. PubMed ID: 15711776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiographic absorptiometry as a screening tool in male osteoporosis: results from the Odense Androgen Study.
Hansen SJ; Nielsen MM; Ryg J; Wraae K; Andersen M; Brixen K
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 19488892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women.
Fiter J; Nolla JM; Gómez-Vaquero C; Martínez-Aguilá D; Valverde J; Roig-Escofet D
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 11527054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Optimal cut-off value of phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry to identify osteoporosis in postmenopausal women].
Liu T; Lu CY; Guo YH; Wang Q; Chen DC
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2014 May; 45(3):506-8, 528. PubMed ID: 24941829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Point-of-Care Phalangeal Bone Mineral Density Measurement Can Reduce the Need of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scanning in Danish Women at Risk of Fracture.
Holmberg T; Bech M; Gram J; Hermann AP; Rubin KH; Brixen K
Calcif Tissue Int; 2016 Mar; 98(3):244-52. PubMed ID: 26590810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?
Damilakis J; Papadokostakis G; Perisinakis K; Hadjipavlou A; Gourtsoyiannis N
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Aug; 14(8):688-93. PubMed ID: 12897977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative bone ultrasound at phalanges and calcaneus in osteoporotic postmenopausal women: influence of age and measurement site.
Camozzi V; De Terlizzi F; Zangari M; Luisetto G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1039-45. PubMed ID: 17445968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ability of peripheral DXA measurements of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density at menopause.
Pouillès JM; Tremollières FA; Martinez S; Delsol M; Ribot C
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 11305086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New method for point-of-care osteoporosis screening and diagnostics.
Karjalainen JP; Riekkinen O; Töyräs J; Jurvelin JS; Kröger H
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Mar; 27(3):971-977. PubMed ID: 26556741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.
Clowes JA; Peel NF; Eastell R
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and validation of the osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) tool to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density.
Salaffi F; Silveri F; Stancati A; Grassi W
Clin Rheumatol; 2005 Jun; 24(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 15549501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of a Swedish T-score reference population for women causes a two-fold increase in the amount of postmenopausal Swedish patients that fulfill the WHO criteria for osteoporosis.
Ribom EL; Ljunggren O; Mallmin H
J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 18280191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Alara Metriscan phalangeal densitometer: evaluation and triage thresholds.
Thorpe JA; Steel SA
Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):778-83. PubMed ID: 18591198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk.
Frediani B; Acciai C; Falsetti P; Baldi F; Filippou G; Siagkri C; Spreafico A; Galeazzi M; Marcolongo R
Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Oct; 79(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 16969597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture.
Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1435-40. PubMed ID: 7992742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Targeted assessment of fracture risk in women at midlife.
Davis SR; Tan A; Bell RJ
Osteoporos Int; 2015 Jun; 26(6):1705-12. PubMed ID: 25630574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
