145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21971417)
1. Biological performance of hydroxyapatite-biopolymer foams: in vitro cell response.
Cicuéndez M; Izquierdo-Barba I; Sánchez-Salcedo S; Vila M; Vallet-Regí M
Acta Biomater; 2012 Feb; 8(2):802-10. PubMed ID: 21971417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving mechanical and biological properties of macroporous HA scaffolds through composite coatings.
Zhao J; Lu X; Duan K; Guo LY; Zhou SB; Weng J
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2009 Nov; 74(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 19679453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhanced osteoinductivity and osteoconductivity through hydroxyapatite coating of silk-based tissue-engineered ligament scaffold.
He P; Sahoo S; Ng KS; Chen K; Toh SL; Goh JC
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Feb; 101(2):555-66. PubMed ID: 22949167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary human osteoblast culture on 3D porous collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffolds.
Jones GL; Walton R; Czernuszka J; Griffiths SL; El Haj AJ; Cartmell SH
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Sep; 94(4):1244-50. PubMed ID: 20694991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a multilayered chitosan-hydroxy-apatite porous composite enriched with fibronectin or an in vitro-generated bone-like extracellular matrix on proliferation and diferentiation of osteoblasts.
Fernández MS; Arias JI; Martínez MJ; Saenz L; Neira-Carrillo A; Yazdani-Pedram M; Arias JL
J Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2012 Jun; 6(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 21812117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High biocompatibility and improved osteogenic potential of novel Ca-P/titania composite scaffolds designed for regeneration of load-bearing segmental bone defects.
Cunha C; Sprio S; Panseri S; Dapporto M; Marcacci M; Tampieri A
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Jun; 101(6):1612-9. PubMed ID: 23172612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhanced mechanical strength and biocompatibility of electrospun polycaprolactone-gelatin scaffold with surface deposited nano-hydroxyapatite.
Jaiswal AK; Chhabra H; Soni VP; Bellare JR
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2013 May; 33(4):2376-85. PubMed ID: 23498272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nanobioengineered electrospun composite nanofibers and osteoblasts for bone regeneration.
Venugopal JR; Low S; Choon AT; Kumar AB; Ramakrishna S
Artif Organs; 2008 May; 32(5):388-97. PubMed ID: 18471168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro response of hFOB cells to pamidronate modified sodium silicate coated cellulose scaffolds.
Ponader S; Brandt H; Vairaktaris E; von Wilmowsky C; Nkenke E; Schlegel KA; Neukam FW; Holst S; Müller FA; Greil P
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2008 Jul; 64(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 18346882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hydroxyapatite and gelatin composite foams processed via novel freeze-drying and crosslinking for use as temporary hard tissue scaffolds.
Kim HW; Knowles JC; Kim HE
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2005 Feb; 72(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 15549783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nonwoven silk fibroin net/nano-hydroxyapatite scaffold: preparation and characterization.
Zhao Y; Chen J; Chou AH; Li G; LeGeros RZ
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Dec; 91(4):1140-9. PubMed ID: 19148924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functionalization of chitosan/poly(lactic acid-glycolic acid) sintered microsphere scaffolds via surface heparinization for bone tissue engineering.
Jiang T; Khan Y; Nair LS; Abdel-Fattah WI; Laurencin CT
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Jun; 93(3):1193-208. PubMed ID: 19777575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preparation, characterization and in vitro analysis of novel structured nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Wang J; Yu X
Acta Biomater; 2010 Aug; 6(8):3004-12. PubMed ID: 20144749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sr-containing hydroxyapatite: morphologies of HA crystals and bioactivity on osteoblast cells.
Aina V; Bergandi L; Lusvardi G; Malavasi G; Imrie FE; Gibson IR; Cerrato G; Ghigo D
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2013 Apr; 33(3):1132-42. PubMed ID: 23827552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enzymatically crosslinked porous composite matrices for bone tissue regeneration.
Ciardelli G; Gentile P; Chiono V; Mattioli-Belmonte M; Vozzi G; Barbani N; Giusti P
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Jan; 92(1):137-51. PubMed ID: 19165785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the osteoblastic activity conferred on Si-doped hydroxyapatite scaffolds by different osteostatin coatings.
Manzano M; Lozano D; Arcos D; Portal-Núñez S; Orden CL; Esbrit P; Vallet-Regí M
Acta Biomater; 2011 Oct; 7(10):3555-62. PubMed ID: 21693201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D interconnected porous biomimetic scaffolds: In vitro cell response.
Panzavolta S; Torricelli P; Amadori S; Parrilli A; Rubini K; della Bella E; Fini M; Bigi A
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Dec; 101(12):3560-70. PubMed ID: 23629945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osteoblast response to continuous phase macroporous scaffolds under static and dynamic culture conditions.
Meretoja VV; Malin M; Seppälä JV; Närhi TO
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 May; 89(2):317-25. PubMed ID: 18431787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stimulation of osteoblast responses to biomimetic nanocomposites of gelatin-hydroxyapatite for tissue engineering scaffolds.
Kim HW; Kim HE; Salih V
Biomaterials; 2005 Sep; 26(25):5221-30. PubMed ID: 15792549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pre-osteoblast infiltration and differentiation in highly porous apatite-coated PLLA electrospun scaffolds.
Whited BM; Whitney JR; Hofmann MC; Xu Y; Rylander MN
Biomaterials; 2011 Mar; 32(9):2294-304. PubMed ID: 21195474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
