These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2197145)

  • 1. Refinement of long-term toxicity and carcinogenesis studies.
    Rao GN; Huff J
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1990 Jul; 15(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 2197145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A perspective on current and future uses of alternative models for carcinogenicity testing.
    Goodman JI
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():173-6. PubMed ID: 11695554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of the Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) and guppy (Poecilia reticulata) in carcinogenesis testing under national toxicology program protocols.
    Hawkins WE; Walker WW; Fournie JW; Manning CS; Krol RM
    Toxicol Pathol; 2003; 31 Suppl():88-91. PubMed ID: 12597435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NTP carcinogenesis studies of 2,2-bis(bromomethyl)-1,3-propanediol, nitromethane, and 1,2,3-trichloropropane (cas nos. 3296-90-0, 75-52-5, and 96-18-4) in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) and medaka (Oryzias latipes) (Waterborne Studies).
    National Toxicology Program
    Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 2005 Oct; (528):1-190. PubMed ID: 16362062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Possibilities for refinement and reduction: future improvements within regulatory testing.
    Stephens ML; Conlee K; Alvino G; Rowan AN
    ILAR J; 2002; 43 Suppl():S74-9. PubMed ID: 12388856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Animals and the 3Rs in toxicology research and testing: The way forward.
    Stokes WS
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2015 Dec; 34(12):1297-303. PubMed ID: 26614819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Animal carcinogenicity studies: implications for the REACH system.
    Knight A; Bailey J; Balcombe J
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():139-47. PubMed ID: 16555967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving prediction of carcinogenicity to reduce, refine, and replace the use of experimental animals.
    Bourcier T; McGovern T; Stavitskaya L; Kruhlak N; Jacobson-Kram D
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2015 Mar; 54(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 25836962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maximum dosage level in testing low-toxicity chemicals for carcinogenicity in rodents.
    Apostolou A; Helton ED
    J Appl Toxicol; 1993; 13(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 8326091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alternatives to the carcinogenicity bioassay for toxicity prediction: are we there yet?
    Benigni R
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2012 Apr; 8(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 22360376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fat rats and carcinogenesis screening.
    Festing MF
    Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6640):321-2. PubMed ID: 9237745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alternative tests: carcinogenesis as an example.
    Schwetz B; Gaylor D
    Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Apr; 106 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):467-71. PubMed ID: 9599693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chemicals associated with site-specific neoplasia in 1394 long-term carcinogenesis experiments in laboratory rodents.
    Huff J; Cirvello J; Haseman J; Bucher J
    Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Jun; 93():247-70. PubMed ID: 1773796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).
    Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM
    Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of in vitro cell transformation assays in regulatory toxicology for pharmaceuticals, chemicals, food products and cosmetics.
    Vanparys P; Corvi R; Aardema MJ; Gribaldo L; Hayashi M; Hoffmann S; Schechtman L
    Mutat Res; 2012 Apr; 744(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 22342612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modulators of carcinogenesis.
    Munro IC; Lynch BS; Kittur A; Nestmann ER
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Feb; 21(1):60-70; discussion 81-6. PubMed ID: 7784637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of immunosuppressant drug carcinogenicity: standard and alternative animal models.
    Hastings KL
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2000 Apr; 19(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 10918520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.