These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21971516)

  • 21. PTree: pattern-based, stochastic search for maximum parsimony phylogenies.
    Gregor I; Steinbrück L; McHardy AC
    PeerJ; 2013; 1():e89. PubMed ID: 23825794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dollo Parsimony Overestimates Ancestral Gene Content Reconstructions.
    Gàlvez-Morante A; Guéguen L; Natsidis P; Telford MJ; Richter DJ
    Genome Biol Evol; 2024 Apr; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 38518756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evolutionary change of restriction cleavage sites and phylogenetic inference for man and apes.
    Nei M; Tajima F
    Mol Biol Evol; 1985 May; 2(3):189-205. PubMed ID: 2835574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. MPBoot: fast phylogenetic maximum parsimony tree inference and bootstrap approximation.
    Hoang DT; Vinh LS; Flouri T; Stamatakis A; von Haeseler A; Minh BQ
    BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Feb; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29390973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reconstructing phylogenetic networks using maximum parsimony.
    Nakhleh L; Jin G; Zhao F; Mellor-Crummey J
    Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf; 2005; ():93-102. PubMed ID: 16447967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluating the Performance of Probabilistic Algorithms for Phylogenetic Analysis of Big Morphological Datasets: A Simulation Study.
    Vernygora OV; Simões TR; Campbell EO
    Syst Biol; 2020 Nov; 69(6):1088-1105. PubMed ID: 32191335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using ESTs for phylogenomics: can one accurately infer a phylogenetic tree from a gappy alignment?
    Hartmann S; Vision TJ
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Mar; 8():95. PubMed ID: 18366758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of protein sequence data under relative branch-length differences and model violation.
    Mar JC; Harlow TJ; Ragan MA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 15676079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of phylogenetic network methods using computer simulation.
    Woolley SM; Posada D; Crandall KA
    PLoS One; 2008 Apr; 3(4):e1913. PubMed ID: 18398452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Early evolutionary relationships among known life forms inferred from elongation factor EF-2/EF-G sequences: phylogenetic coherence and structure of the archaeal domain.
    Cammarano P; Palm P; Creti R; Ceccarelli E; Sanangelantoni AM; Tiboni O
    J Mol Evol; 1992 May; 34(5):396-405. PubMed ID: 1602493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nucleotide substitution models and estimation of phylogeny.
    Håstad O; Björklund M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Nov; 15(11):1381-9. PubMed ID: 12572602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Utility of characters evolving at diverse rates of evolution to resolve quartet trees with unequal branch lengths: analytical predictions of long-branch effects.
    Su Z; Townsend JP
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 May; 15():86. PubMed ID: 25968460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.
    Tamura K; Peterson D; Peterson N; Stecher G; Nei M; Kumar S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Oct; 28(10):2731-9. PubMed ID: 21546353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing approaches for inferring species trees from multi-copy genes.
    Chaudhary R; Boussau B; Burleigh JG; Fernández-Baca D
    Syst Biol; 2015 Mar; 64(2):325-39. PubMed ID: 25540456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference.
    Rosenberg MS; Kumar S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Sep; 98(19):10751-6. PubMed ID: 11526218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. ImOSM: intermittent evolution and robustness of phylogenetic methods.
    Thi Nguyen MA; Gesell T; von Haeseler A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):663-73. PubMed ID: 21940641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences based on the distribution of substitution rates among sites as estimated by parsimony.
    Tourasse NJ; Gouy M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Mar; 14(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9066796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood.
    Guindon S; Gascuel O
    Syst Biol; 2003 Oct; 52(5):696-704. PubMed ID: 14530136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The accuracy of species tree estimation under simulation: a comparison of methods.
    Leaché AD; Rannala B
    Syst Biol; 2011 Mar; 60(2):126-37. PubMed ID: 21088009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.