These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21971551)

  • 1. Self-powered electroporation using a singularity-induced nano-electroporation configuration.
    Troszak GD; Rubinsky B
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2011 Oct; 414(2):419-24. PubMed ID: 21971551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A theoretical analysis of the feasibility of a singularity-induced micro-electroporation system.
    Troszak GD; Rubinsky B
    PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e18523. PubMed ID: 21494612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vivo non-thermal irreversible electroporation impact on rat liver galvanic apparent internal resistance.
    Golberg A; Laufer S; Rabinowitch HD; Rubinsky B
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):951-63. PubMed ID: 21248392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A primary current distribution model of a novel micro-electroporation channel configuration.
    Troszak GD; Rubinsky B
    Biomed Microdevices; 2010 Oct; 12(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 20532636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regional electroporation of single cardiac myocytes in a focused electric field.
    Klauke N; Smith G; Cooper JM
    Anal Chem; 2010 Jan; 82(2):585-92. PubMed ID: 20020746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-electrolytic microelectroporation.
    Lyu C; Wang J; Rubinsky B
    Biomed Microdevices; 2017 Sep; 19(3):65. PubMed ID: 28710644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of cytoplasm conductivity by nanosecond pulsed electric fields.
    Denzi A; Merla C; Palego C; Paffi A; Ning Y; Multari CR; Cheng X; Apollonio F; Hwang JC; Liberti M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jun; 62(6):1595-603. PubMed ID: 25667343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrical modeling of the influence of medium conductivity on electroporation.
    Ivorra A; Villemejane J; Mir LM
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2010 Sep; 12(34):10055-64. PubMed ID: 20585676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vivo electrical conductivity measurements during and after tumor electroporation: conductivity changes reflect the treatment outcome.
    Ivorra A; Al-Sakere B; Rubinsky B; Mir LM
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(19):5949-63. PubMed ID: 19759406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nanoelectroporation: a first look.
    Sundararajan R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 423():109-28. PubMed ID: 18370193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of the electroporation in the field calculation in biological tissues.
    Ramos A
    Artif Organs; 2005 Jun; 29(6):510-3. PubMed ID: 15926990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electroporation based on hydrodynamic focusing of microfluidics with low dc voltage.
    Zhu T; Luo C; Huang J; Xiong C; Ouyang Q; Fang J
    Biomed Microdevices; 2010 Feb; 12(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 19757070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Micro pulsed radio-frequency electroporation chips.
    He H; Chang DC; Lee YK
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2006 Jan; 68(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 16039911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numerical simulation of electroporation in spherical cells.
    Ramos A; Suzuki DO; Marques JL
    Artif Organs; 2004 Apr; 28(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 15084196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electroporation of cells using EM induction of ac fields by a magnetic stimulator.
    Chen C; Evans JA; Robinson MP; Smye SW; O'Toole P
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1219-29. PubMed ID: 20124654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nanosecond pulsed electric field generators for the study of subcellular effects.
    Kolb JF; Kono S; Schoenbach KH
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2006 Apr; 27(3):172-87. PubMed ID: 16304697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Targeted In Vivo Electroporation Using Nanoengineered Microelectrodes.
    Schwarz D; Schaefer AT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2050():113-120. PubMed ID: 31468485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Micronozzle array enhanced sandwich electroporation of embryonic stem cells.
    Fei Z; Hu X; Choi HW; Wang S; Farson D; Lee LJ
    Anal Chem; 2010 Jan; 82(1):353-8. PubMed ID: 19961232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Continuous low-voltage dc electroporation on a microfluidic chip with polyelectrolytic salt bridges.
    Kim SK; Kim JH; Kim KP; Chung TD
    Anal Chem; 2007 Oct; 79(20):7761-6. PubMed ID: 17874852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility of employing model-based optimization of pulse amplitude and electrode distance for effective tumor electropermeabilization.
    Sel D; Lebar AM; Miklavcic D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 May; 54(5):773-81. PubMed ID: 17518273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.