These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2197172)
1. Comparison of microleakage between direct placement composites and direct composite inlays. Scherer W; Caliskan F; Kaim J; Moss S; Vijayaraghavan T Gen Dent; 1990; 38(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 2197172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dental amalgam--what are the alternatives? Tyas MJ Int Dent J; 1994 Aug; 44(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 7822054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of gap size and cement type on gingival microleakage in Class V resin composite inlays. Browning WD; Safirstein J Quintessence Int; 1997 Aug; 28(8):541-4. PubMed ID: 9477882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer. Payne JH J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of insertion technique on microleakage in mesio-occlusodistal composite resin restorations. Eakle WS; Ito RK Quintessence Int; 1990 May; 21(5):369-74. PubMed ID: 2243940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents. Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage of a posterior composite resin lined with glass ionomer. Garcia-Godoy F Gen Dent; 1988; 36(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 3271735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations. Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of several tooth-colored restorative materials in cervical cavities. A comparative study in vitro. Gordon M; Plasschaert AJ; Stark MM Dent Mater; 1986 Oct; 2(5):228-31. PubMed ID: 3542663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of four composite resins over a glass ionomer cement base in Class V restorations. Gordon M; Plasschaert AJ; Soelberg KB; Bogdan MS Quintessence Int; 1985 Dec; 16(12):817-20. PubMed ID: 3868783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro microleakage study of the 'bonded-base' restorative technique. Yap AU; Mok BY; Pearson G J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Mar; 24(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 9131479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinically successful dentin and enamel bonding. Ibsen R; Ouellet D; Strassler H Am J Dent; 1989 Jul; 2 Spec No():125-31. PubMed ID: 2700301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Resin modified glass ionomer cements. In vitro microleakage in direct class V and class II sandwich restorations. Sjödin L; Uusitalo M; van Dijken J Swed Dent J; 1996; 20(3):77-86. PubMed ID: 8957133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement. Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Micro-gap formations in Class V restorations using 4 types of composites and glass ionomer linings]. Gordon M; Plasschaert AJ; Soelberg K; Bogdan MS Tidsskr Tandlaeger; 1986 Apr; 6(2):71-3. PubMed ID: 3462962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]