226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21971938)
1. Tibial component designs in primary total knee arthroplasty: should we reconsider all-polyethylene component?
Cheng T; Pan X; Liu T; Zhang X
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2012 Aug; 20(8):1438-49. PubMed ID: 21971938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Elmhiregh A; Abuodeh Y; Alzobi O; Zikria B; Alkhayarin M; Morrey BF
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2023 Dec; 33(8):3611-3622. PubMed ID: 37249643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. All-polyethylene tibial components are equal to metal-backed components: systematic review and meta-regression.
Nouta KA; Verra WC; Pijls BG; Schoones JW; Nelissen RG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 470(12):3549-59. PubMed ID: 22972656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.
Longo UG; Ciuffreda M; D'Andrea V; Mannering N; Locher J; Denaro V
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3620-3636. PubMed ID: 27209191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. All-Polyethylene Versus Metal-Backed Tibial Components-An Analysis of 27,733 Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacements from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register.
Gudnason A; Hailer NP; W-Dahl A; Sundberg M; Robertsson O
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jun; 96(12):994-999. PubMed ID: 24951734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty.
Cheng T; Zhang G; Zhang X
Acta Orthop; 2011 Oct; 82(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 21895503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cemented all-polyethylene and metal-backed polyethylene tibial components used for primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials involving 1798 primary total knee implants.
Voigt J; Mosier M
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Oct; 93(19):1790-8. PubMed ID: 22005864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Survivorship of Different Tibial Designs in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Kremers HM; Sierra RJ; Schleck CD; Berry DJ; Cabanela ME; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jul; 96(14):e121. PubMed ID: 25031383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metal-Backed Tibial Components Do Not Reduce Risk of Early Aseptic Loosening in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Costa GG; Lo Presti M; Grassi A; Agrò G; Cialdella S; Mosca M; Caravelli S; Zaffagnini S
J Knee Surg; 2020 Feb; 33(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 30650439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Metal or Modularity: Why Do Metal-Backed Tibias Have Inferior Outcomes to All-Polyethylene Tibial Components in Patients With Osteoarthritis.
Houdek MT; Watts CD; Wyles CC; Martin JR; Trousdale RT; Taunton MJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Mar; 32(3):836-842. PubMed ID: 27816367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. All-Polyethylene Tibial Components: An Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes and Infection.
Houdek MT; Wagner ER; Wyles CC; Watts CD; Cass JR; Trousdale RT
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1476-82. PubMed ID: 27067171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Meta-Analysis Comparing All-Polyethylene Tibial Component to Metal-Backed Tibial Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Assessing Survivorship and Functional Outcomes.
Voss B; El-Othmani MM; Schnur AK; Botchway A; Mihalko WM; Saleh KJ
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2628-2636. PubMed ID: 27538714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibias have similar outcomes at 10 years: a randomized level I [corrected] evidence study.
Gioe TJ; Stroemer ES; Santos ER
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Feb; 455():212-8. PubMed ID: 17006363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cementless metal-backed patellar components in primary total knee arthroplasty using an implant of modern design.
Baker JF; Nadar AC; Jouflas AC; Smith LS; Sachdeva S; Yakkanti MR; Malkani AL
Bone Joint J; 2023 Dec; 105-B(12):1279-1285. PubMed ID: 38035601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components.
Gioe TJ; Bowman KR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2000 Nov; (380):108-15. PubMed ID: 11064980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. All-polyethylene compared with metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty at ten years. A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Bettinson KA; Pinder IM; Moran CG; Weir DJ; Lingard EA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jul; 91(7):1587-94. PubMed ID: 19571080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early to Midterm Clinical and Radiographic Survivorship of the All-Polyethylene Versus Modular Metal-Backed Tibia Component in Primary Total Knee Replacement.
Herschmiller T; Bradley KE; Wellman SS; Attarian DE
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2019; 28(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 31411955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. All-polyethylene vs. metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty-a randomized RSA study comparing early fixation of horizontally and completely cemented tibial components: part 1. Horizontally cemented components: AP better fixated than MB.
Hyldahl H; Regnér L; Carlsson L; Kärrholm J; Weidenhielm L
Acta Orthop; 2005 Dec; 76(6):769-77. PubMed ID: 16470428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modular Metal-Backed Tibial Components Provide Minimal Mid-Term Survivorship Benefits Despite Increased Cost and Frequency of Use: A Retrospective Review of the American Joint Replacement Registry Database.
Kelley B; Mullen K; De A; Sassoon A
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8):1570-1574.e1. PubMed ID: 35189294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survivorship comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty--Chinese experience.
Shen B; Yang J; Zhou Z; Kang P; Wang L; Pei F
Int Orthop; 2009 Oct; 33(5):1243-7. PubMed ID: 18688613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
