These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21972767)

  • 1. Fore- and rearfoot kinematics in high- and low-arched individuals during running.
    Barnes A; Wheat J; Milner CE
    Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Jul; 32(7):710-6. PubMed ID: 21972767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Farahpour N; Allard P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Jan; 22(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17049700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of foot kinematics in people with normal- and flat-arched feet using the Oxford Foot Model.
    Levinger P; Murley GS; Barton CJ; Cotchett MP; McSweeney SR; Menz HB
    Gait Posture; 2010 Oct; 32(4):519-23. PubMed ID: 20696579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frontal plane multi-segment foot kinematics in high- and low-arched females during dynamic loading tasks.
    Powell DW; Long B; Milner CE; Zhang S
    Hum Mov Sci; 2011 Feb; 30(1):105-14. PubMed ID: 21220174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthotic intervention in forefoot and rearfoot strike running patterns.
    Stackhouse CL; Davis IM; Hamill J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2004 Jan; 19(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 14659932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of foot kinematics between subjects with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction and healthy controls.
    Tome J; Nawoczenski DA; Flemister A; Houck J
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2006 Sep; 36(9):635-44. PubMed ID: 17017268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased medial longitudinal arch mobility, lower extremity kinematics, and ground reaction forces in high-arched runners.
    Williams DS; Tierney RN; Butler RJ
    J Athl Train; 2014; 49(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 24840580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forefoot angle determines duration and amplitude of pronation during walking.
    Monaghan GM; Lewis CL; Hsu WH; Saltzman E; Hamill J; Holt KG
    Gait Posture; 2013 May; 38(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23117096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gender differences associated with rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot kinematics during running.
    Takabayashi T; Edama M; Nakamura M; Nakamura E; Inai T; Kubo M
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Nov; 17(10):1289-1296. PubMed ID: 28961074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical Factors Associated With Achilles Tendinopathy and Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome in Runners.
    Becker J; James S; Wayner R; Osternig L; Chou LS
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Sep; 45(11):2614-2621. PubMed ID: 28581815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forefoot midsole stiffness affects forefoot and rearfoot kinematics during the stance phase of gait.
    Resende RA; Fonseca ST; Silva PL; Pertence AE; Kirkwood RN
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 104(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 24725040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-segment foot kinematics and ground reaction forces during gait of individuals with plantar fasciitis.
    Chang R; Rodrigues PA; Van Emmerik RE; Hamill J
    J Biomech; 2014 Aug; 47(11):2571-7. PubMed ID: 24992816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaction of arch type and footwear on running mechanics.
    Butler RJ; Davis IS; Hamill J
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1998-2005. PubMed ID: 16902231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in Kinematic Coupling Among the Rearfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot Segments During Running and Walking.
    Takabayashi T; Edama M; Yokoyama E; Kanaya C; Inai T; Tokunaga Y; Kubo M
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2018 Jan; 108(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 29547030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orthoses posted in both the forefoot and rearfoot reduce moments and angular impulses on lower extremity joints during walking.
    Hsu WH; Lewis CL; Monaghan GM; Saltzman E; Hamill J; Holt KG
    J Biomech; 2014 Aug; 47(11):2618-25. PubMed ID: 24968944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in foot and shank coupling due to alterations in foot strike pattern during running.
    Pohl MB; Buckley JG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Mar; 23(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 18006125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forefoot, rearfoot and shank coupling: effect of variations in speed and mode of gait.
    Pohl MB; Messenger N; Buckley JG
    Gait Posture; 2007 Feb; 25(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 16759862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Association Between Foot Structure and Foot Kinematics During Slow Running.
    Djun MHT; Chay JTC
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2021 Dec; 111(6):. PubMed ID: 32780124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Foot pronation during walking is associated to the mechanical resistance of the midfoot joint complex.
    Gomes RBO; Souza TR; Paes BDC; Magalhães FA; Gontijo BA; Fonseca ST; Ocarino JM; Resende RA
    Gait Posture; 2019 May; 70():20-23. PubMed ID: 30780086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying coordination among the rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot segments during running.
    Takabayashi T; Edama M; Yokoyama E; Kanaya C; Kubo M
    Sports Biomech; 2018 Mar; 17(1):18-32. PubMed ID: 28632051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.