BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21973063)

  • 1. The minimum time for cranioplasty insertion from craniectomy is six months to reduce risk of infection--a case series of 82 patients.
    Thavarajah D; De Lacy P; Hussien A; Sugar A
    Br J Neurosurg; 2012 Feb; 26(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 21973063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of acrylic and titanium cranioplasty.
    Al-Tamimi YZ; Sinha P; Trivedi M; Robson C; Al-Musawi TA; Hossain N; Mumford C; Towns G
    Br J Neurosurg; 2012 Aug; 26(4):510-3. PubMed ID: 22686127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting graft infection after cranioplasty.
    Cheng YK; Weng HH; Yang JT; Lee MH; Wang TC; Chang CN
    J Clin Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 15(10):1115-9. PubMed ID: 18656363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Autologous and acrylic cranioplasty: a review of 10 years and 258 cases.
    Klinger DR; Madden C; Beshay J; White J; Gambrell K; Rickert K
    World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(3-4):e525-30. PubMed ID: 24036124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acute autologous bone flap infection after cranioplasty for postinjury decompressive craniectomy.
    Huang YH; Yang TM; Lee TC; Chen WF; Yang KY
    Injury; 2013 Jan; 44(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 22154044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cranioplasty for large skull defects with PMMA (Polymethylmethacrylate) or Tutoplast processed autogenic bone grafts.
    Kriegel RJ; Schaller C; Clusmann H
    Zentralbl Neurochir; 2007 Nov; 68(4):182-9. PubMed ID: 17966077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the factors influencing bone graft infection after cranioplasty.
    Lee CH; Chung YS; Lee SH; Yang HJ; Son YJ
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Jul; 73(1):255-60. PubMed ID: 22743392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A preliminary report on the use of antibiotic-impregnated methyl methacrylate in salvage cranioplasty.
    Hsu VM; Tahiri Y; Wilson AJ; Grady MS; Taylor JA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 25(2):393-6. PubMed ID: 24561365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-designed polyetheretherketone implants versus titanium mesh (± acrylic cement) in alloplastic cranioplasty: a retrospective single-surgeon, single-center study.
    Ng ZY; Ang WJ; Nawaz I
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014; 25(2):e185-9. PubMed ID: 24621767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cranioplasty of Hemispherical Defects Using High Impact Methylmethacrylic Plate.
    Kumar NG; Rangarajan H; Shourie P
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):1882-6. PubMed ID: 26355975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cranioplasty with custom-made titanium plates--14 years experience.
    Wiggins A; Austerberry R; Morrison D; Ho KM; Honeybul S
    Neurosurgery; 2013 Feb; 72(2):248-56; discussion 256. PubMed ID: 23149967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seven years of cranioplasty in a regional neurosurgical centre.
    Broughton E; Pobereskin L; Whitfield PC
    Br J Neurosurg; 2014 Jan; 28(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 23875882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Titanium cranioplasty and the prediction of complications.
    Hill CS; Luoma AM; Wilson SR; Kitchen N
    Br J Neurosurg; 2012 Dec; 26(6):832-7. PubMed ID: 22702389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The fate of titanium miniplates and screws used in maxillofacial surgery: a 10 year retrospective study.
    O'Connell J; Murphy C; Ikeagwuani O; Adley C; Kearns G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):731-5. PubMed ID: 19303742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A retrospective analysis and review of an institution's experience with the complications of cranioplasty.
    Lee L; Ker J; Quah BL; Chou N; Choy D; Yeo TT
    Br J Neurosurg; 2013 Oct; 27(5):629-35. PubMed ID: 23879443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cranioplasty with hydroxyapatite or acrylic is associated with a reduced risk of all-cause and infection-associated explantation.
    Millward CP; Doherty JA; Mustafa MA; Humphries TJ; Islim AI; Richardson GE; Clynch AL; Gillespie CS; Keshwara SM; Kolamunnage-Dona R; Brodbelt AR; Jenkinson MD; Duncan C; Sinha A; McMahon CJ
    Br J Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 36(3):385-393. PubMed ID: 35608052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Construction of titanium cranioplasty plate using craniectomy bone flap as template.
    Bhargava D; Bartlett P; Russell J; Liddington M; Tyagi A; Chumas P
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Jan; 152(1):173-6. PubMed ID: 19533018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Cranioplasty; new ways (author's transl)].
    Badó Z; Tari G
    Zentralbl Chir; 1977; 102(21):1313-9. PubMed ID: 602489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy and Versatility of the 3-D Titanium Mesh Implant in the Closure of Large Post-Craniectomy Osseous Defects, and its Therapeutic Role in Reversing the Syndrome of the Trephined: Clinical Study of a Case Series and Review of Literature.
    Jeyaraj P
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2016 Mar; 15(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 26929558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of Immediate Titanium Cranioplasty Following Post-Craniotomy Infection.
    Talwar AA; Bhat DK; Heiman AJ; Ricci JA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(5):1404-1407. PubMed ID: 32310891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.