These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21973097)

  • 1. Plausible measurement analogies to some psychometric models of test performance.
    Kyngdon A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):478-97. PubMed ID: 21973097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating latent constructs with item response models: a MATLAB IRTm toolbox.
    Braeken J; Tuerlinckx F
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1127-37. PubMed ID: 19897820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Random parameter structure and the testlet model: extension of the Rasch testlet model.
    Paek I; Yon H; Wilson M; Kang T
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):394-407. PubMed ID: 19934527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analyzing nonadditive conjoint structures: compounding events by Rasch model probabilities.
    Karabatsos G
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(3):191-221. PubMed ID: 9711021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The psychometricians' fallacy: too clever by half?
    Michell J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):41-55. PubMed ID: 17908369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting differential item functioning with five standardized item-fit indices in the Rasch model.
    Seol H
    J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(3):233-47. PubMed ID: 10431491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rasch analysis of distractors in multiple-choice items.
    Wang WC
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(1):43-65. PubMed ID: 9661731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The recovery of the density scale using a stochastic quasi-realization of additive conjoint measurement.
    Pelton TW; Bunderson CV
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 12904677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rasch modeling of accuracy and confidence measures from cognitive tests.
    Paek I; Lee J; Stankov L; Wilson M
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(3):232-48. PubMed ID: 23816612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The shortened Raven Standard Progressive Matrices: item response theory-based psychometric analyses and normative data.
    Van der Elst W; Ouwehand C; van Rijn P; Lee N; Van Boxtel M; Jolles J
    Assessment; 2013 Feb; 20(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 21807748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using the Rasch model in nursing research: an introduction and illustrative example.
    Hagquist C; Bruce M; Gustavsson JP
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):380-93. PubMed ID: 19059593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using Guttman's mapping sentences and Many Facet Rasch Measurement Theory to develop an instrument that examines the grading philosophies of teachers.
    Randall J; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(2):122-41. PubMed ID: 20693698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mini-Mental Status Examination: mixed Rasch model item analysis derived two different cognitive dimensions of the MMSE.
    Schultz-Larsen K; Kreiner S; Lomholt RK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):268-79. PubMed ID: 17292021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: Part II.
    Myford CM; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):189-227. PubMed ID: 15064538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is the partial credit model a Rasch model?
    Massof RW
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(2):114-31. PubMed ID: 22805357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive diagnostic assessment with different weight for attribute: based on the Dina model.
    Guo L; Bao Y; Wang Z; Bian Y
    Psychol Rep; 2014 Jun; 114(3):802-22. PubMed ID: 25074303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative analysis of the ratings in performance assessment using generalizability theory and the many-facet Rasch model.
    Kim SC; Wilson M
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):408-23. PubMed ID: 19934528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychometric aspects of item mapping for criterion-referenced interpretation and bookmark standard setting.
    Huynh H
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 20351450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding the unit in the Rasch model.
    Humphry SM; Andrich D
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 18753694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.