These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21973098)

  • 1. Constructing bootstrap confidence intervals for principal component loadings in the presence of missing data: a multiple-imputation approach.
    van Ginkel JR; Kiers HA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):498-515. PubMed ID: 21973098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlations corrected for indirect range restriction.
    Li JC; Chan W; Cui Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):367-87. PubMed ID: 21973092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating confidence intervals for principal component loadings: a comparison between the bootstrap and asymptotic results.
    Timmerman ME; Kiers HA; Smilde AK
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):295-314. PubMed ID: 17971271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Corrected profile likelihood confidence interval for binomial paired incomplete data.
    Pradhan V; Menon S; Das U
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 23296487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using the bootstrap to improve estimation and confidence intervals for regression coefficients selected using backwards variable elimination.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(17):3286-300. PubMed ID: 17940997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bootstrap confidence intervals in multi-level simultaneous component analysis.
    Timmerman ME; Kiers HA; Smilde AK; Ceulemans E; Stouten J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):299-318. PubMed ID: 18086338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of the bootstrap in analysing cost data from cluster randomised trials: some simulation results.
    Flynn TN; Peters TJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):33. PubMed ID: 15550169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the performance of different procedures for constructing confidence intervals for coefficient alpha: a simulation study.
    Cui Y; Li J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):467-98. PubMed ID: 22295951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of methods for constructing confidence intervals of standardized indirect effects.
    Cheung MW
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):425-38. PubMed ID: 19363183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A bootstrap test for comparing two variances: simulation of size and power in small samples.
    Sun J; Chernick MR; LaBudde RA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Nov; 21(6):1079-93. PubMed ID: 22023677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of confidence limit estimates of cluster analysis on molecular marker data.
    Kayis SA
    J Sci Food Agric; 2012 Mar; 92(4):776-80. PubMed ID: 21969118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes.
    Walters SJ; Campbell MJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1075-102. PubMed ID: 15570625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust imputation method for missing values in microarray data.
    Yoon D; Lee EK; Park T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S6. PubMed ID: 17493255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sharp simultaneous confidence intervals for the means of selected populations with application to microarray data analysis.
    Qiu J; Hwang JT
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):767-76. PubMed ID: 17403105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of the Fieller-Hinkley distribution of the ratio of random variables in testing for noninferiority.
    Koti KM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):215-28. PubMed ID: 17365219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-parametric estimators of a monotonic dose-response curve and bootstrap confidence intervals.
    Dilleen M; Heimann G; Hirsch I
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):869-82. PubMed ID: 12627406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standardized Regression Coefficients and Newly Proposed Estimators for [Formula: see text] in Multiply Imputed Data.
    van Ginkel JR
    Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):185-205. PubMed ID: 32162232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A nonparametric procedure for the two-factor mixed model with missing data.
    Gao X
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):774-88. PubMed ID: 17634980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A note on effective sample size for constructing confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions.
    Liu GF
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 22337507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of individual agreements with repeated measurements based on generalized confidence intervals.
    Quiroz J; Burdick RK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 19212885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.