These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21973359)

  • 1. Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.
    Allen K; Alais D; Shinn-Cunningham B; Carlile S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2043-53. PubMed ID: 21973359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.
    Ihlefeld A; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45296. PubMed ID: 23028914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.
    Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1627-37. PubMed ID: 19045654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The intelligibility of speech in a harmonic masker varying in fundamental frequency contour, broadband temporal envelope, and spatial location.
    Leclère T; Lavandier M; Deroche MLD
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():1-10. PubMed ID: 28390253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.
    Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2093. PubMed ID: 28372135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancing listener strategies using a payoff matrix in speech-on-speech masking experiments.
    Thompson ER; Iyer N; Simpson BD; Wakefield GH; Kieras DE; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1297-304. PubMed ID: 26428768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The multiple contributions of interaural differences to improved speech intelligibility in multitalker scenarios.
    Schoenmaker E; Brand T; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2589. PubMed ID: 27250153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefits of knowing who, where, and when in multi-talker listening.
    Kitterick PT; Bailey PJ; Summerfield AQ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2498-508. PubMed ID: 20370032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
    Leibold LJ; Yarnell Bonino A; Buss E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of a consistent target or masker voice on target speech intelligibility in two- and three-talker mixtures.
    Samson F; Johnsrude IS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1037-46. PubMed ID: 27036241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phoneme recognition in modulated maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1646-54. PubMed ID: 22978893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.
    Bernstein JG; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Target identification using relative level in multi-talker listening.
    Kitterick PT; Clarke E; O'Shea C; Seymour J; Summerfield AQ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2899-909. PubMed ID: 23654395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of masker predictability in the cocktail party problem.
    Jones GL; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3818-30. PubMed ID: 19206808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.