These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21973362)
21. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise. Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing. Chen F; Loizou PC Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility. Gilbert RC; Chandrasekaran B; Smiljanic R J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 24437779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of visual cues on top-down restoration of temporally interrupted speech, with and without further degradations. Benard MR; Başkent D Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():24-33. PubMed ID: 26117407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Acoustic predictors of intelligibility for segmentally interrupted speech: temporal envelope, voicing, and duration. Fogerty D J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1402-8. PubMed ID: 23838986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The role of segmental and durational cues in the processing of reduced words. van de Ven M; Ernestus M Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):358-383. PubMed ID: 28870139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices. Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise. Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech. Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intelligibility of time-compressed speech: the effect of uniform versus non-uniform time-compression algorithms. Schlueter A; Lemke U; Kollmeier B; Holube I J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1541-55. PubMed ID: 24606289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Critical bandwidth speech: Arrays of subcritical band speech maintain near-ceiling intelligibility at high amplitudes. Warren RM; Bashford JA; Lenz PW J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL222. PubMed ID: 28372079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The role of vowel and consonant fundamental frequency, envelope, and temporal fine structure cues to the intelligibility of words and sentences. Fogerty D; Humes LE J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1490-501. PubMed ID: 22352519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Speaking rate affects the perception of duration as a suprasegmental lexical-stress cue. Reinisch E; Jesse A; McQueen JM Lang Speech; 2011 Jun; 54(Pt 2):147-65. PubMed ID: 21848077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of intelligibility on working memory demand for speech perception. Francis AL; Nusbaum HC Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1360-74. PubMed ID: 19633351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss. Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. On the possible role of brain rhythms in speech perception: intelligibility of time-compressed speech with periodic and aperiodic insertions of silence. Ghitza O; Greenberg S Phonetica; 2009; 66(1-2):113-26. PubMed ID: 19390234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Acoustic richness modulates the neural networks supporting intelligible speech processing. Lee YS; Min NE; Wingfield A; Grossman M; Peelle JE Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():108-117. PubMed ID: 26723103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Informational masking and the effects of differences in fundamental frequency and fundamental-frequency contour on phonetic integration in a formant ensemble. Summers RJ; Bailey PJ; Roberts B Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():295-303. PubMed ID: 27815130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]