These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21974869)

  • 1. Yes, they can! Appropriate weighting of small probabilities as a function of information acquisition.
    Hilbig BE; Glöckner A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Nov; 138(3):390-6. PubMed ID: 21974869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice.
    Hertwig R; Barron G; Weber EU; Erev I
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Aug; 15(8):534-9. PubMed ID: 15270998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exaggerated risk: prospect theory and probability weighting in risky choice.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Ayton P; Dent J; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1487-505. PubMed ID: 19857019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are probabilities overweighted or underweighted when rare outcomes are experienced (rarely)?
    Ungemach C; Chater N; Stewart N
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Apr; 20(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 19399978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to Change the Weight of Rare Events in Decisions From Experience.
    Hotaling JM; Jarvstad A; Donkin C; Newell BR
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1767-1779. PubMed ID: 31725348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decision by sampling: the role of the decision environment in risky choice.
    Stewart N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1041-62. PubMed ID: 19306161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the shape of the probability weighting function.
    Gonzalez R; Wu G
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):129-66. PubMed ID: 10090801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of ambiguity and risk on decision making in mild Alzheimer's disease.
    Sinz H; Zamarian L; Benke T; Wenning GK; Delazer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2043-55. PubMed ID: 18339408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feedback produces divergence from prospect theory in descriptive choice.
    Jessup RK; Bishara AJ; Busemeyer JR
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1015-22. PubMed ID: 19000212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dopaminergic Drug Effects on Probability Weighting during Risky Decision Making.
    Ojala KE; Janssen LK; Hashemi MM; Timmer MHM; Geurts DEM; Ter Huurne NP; Cools R; Sescousse G
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29632870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The description-experience gap in risky choice.
    Hertwig R; Erev I
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2009 Dec; 13(12):517-23. PubMed ID: 19836292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distinct neuropsychological processes may mediate decision-making under uncertainty with known and unknown probability in gain and loss frames.
    Inukai K; Takahashi T
    Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 16574332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Framing effects and risk-sensitive decision making.
    Mishra S; Gregson M; Lalumière ML
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Feb; 103(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 22229776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When does information about probability count in choices under risk?
    Tyszka T; Zaleskiewicz T
    Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1623-36. PubMed ID: 17184402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospect theory on the brain? Toward a cognitive neuroscience of decision under risk.
    Trepel C; Fox CR; Poldrack RA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 23(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 15795132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.
    Zamarian L; Sinz H; Bonatti E; Gamboz N; Delazer M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Sep; 22(5):645-57. PubMed ID: 18763884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decision making under risk and under ambiguity in Parkinson's disease.
    Delazer M; Sinz H; Zamarian L; Stockner H; Seppi K; Wenning GK; Benke T; Poewe W
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1901-8. PubMed ID: 19428422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The experience-description gap and the role of the inter decision interval.
    Teoderescu K; Amir M; Erev I
    Prog Brain Res; 2013; 202():99-115. PubMed ID: 23317828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Description- and experience-based choice: does equivalent information equal equivalent choice?
    Camilleri AR; Newell BR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):276-84. PubMed ID: 21186019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in risk-defusing behavior in deciding for oneself versus deciding for other people.
    Pollai M; Kirchler E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):239-43. PubMed ID: 22018657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.