These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21975256)
41. Developing biosafety risk hypotheses for invertebrates exposed to GM plants using conceptual food webs: a case study with elevated triacylglyceride levels in ryegrass. Barratt BI; Todd JH; Burgess EP; Malone LA Environ Biosafety Res; 2010; 9(3):163-79. PubMed ID: 21975257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Biosafety testing of genetically modified ryegrass (Lolium perenne) using a model for the optimum selection of test invertebrates. Barratt BI; Todd JH; Ferguson CM; Crook K; Burgess EP; Barraclough EI; Malone LA Environ Entomol; 2013 Aug; 42(4):820-30. PubMed ID: 23905747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Developing risk hypotheses and selecting species for assessing non-target impacts of GM trees with novel traits: the case of altered-lignin pine trees. Malone LA; Todd JH; Burgess EP; Walter C; Wagner A; Barratt BI Environ Biosafety Res; 2010; 9(4):181-98. PubMed ID: 22293130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Gene flow in Prunus species in the context of novel trait risk assessment. Cici SZ; Van Acker RC Environ Biosafety Res; 2010; 9(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 21288463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Gene flow, invasiveness, and ecological impact of genetically modified crops. Warwick SI; Beckie HJ; Hall LM Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jun; 1168():72-99. PubMed ID: 19566704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Development of antituberculous drugs: current status and future prospects]. Tomioka H; Namba K Kekkaku; 2006 Dec; 81(12):753-74. PubMed ID: 17240921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Long-term oceanographic and ecological research in the Western English Channel. Southward AJ; Langmead O; Hardman-Mountford NJ; Aiken J; Boalch GT; Dando PR; Genner MJ; Joint I; Kendall MA; Halliday NC; Harris RP; Leaper R; Mieszkowska N; Pingree RD; Richardson AJ; Sims DW; Smith T; Walne AW; Hawkins SJ Adv Mar Biol; 2005; 47():1-105. PubMed ID: 15596166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Using existing data to predict and quantify the risks of GM forage to a population of a non-target invertebrate species: a New Zealand case study. O'Callaghan M; Soboleva TK; Barratt BI Environ Biosafety Res; 2010; 9(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 21975256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks. Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Assessment of the safety of foods derived from genetically modified (GM) crops. König A; Cockburn A; Crevel RW; Debruyne E; Grafstroem R; Hammerling U; Kimber I; Knudsen I; Kuiper HA; Peijnenburg AA; Penninks AH; Poulsen M; Schauzu M; Wal JM Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):1047-88. PubMed ID: 15123382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]