These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21975795)

  • 1. Accuracy of fit of 3-to-3 retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium-iron-boron magnet chain.
    Hahn W; Wasser-Merkel W; Lange K; Gruber RM; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Ihlow D
    J Orofac Orthop; 2011 Oct; 72(5):381-8. PubMed ID: 21975795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of a neodymium-iron-boron magnet device for positioning a multi-stranded wire retainer in lingual retention--a pilot study in humans.
    Hahn W; Fricke J; Fricke-Zech S; Zapf A; Gruber R; Sadat-Khonsari R
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):433-6. PubMed ID: 18687989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shear bond strength of different fixed orthodontic retainers.
    Al-Nimri K; Al-Nimri J
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 26999891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Torque resistance of different stainless steel wires commonly used for fixed retainers in orthodontics.
    Arnold DT; Dalstra M; Verna C
    J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 43(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 27104351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [An evaluation on corrosion resistance of magnetic retainers].
    Zhang F; Hu B; Zheng Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Jul; 36(4):295-7. PubMed ID: 11718015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites.
    Foek DL; Ozcan M; Krebs E; Sandham A
    J Adhes Dent; 2009 Oct; 11(5):381-90. PubMed ID: 19841765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Life Cycle Assessment of Neodymium-Iron-Boron Magnet-to-Magnet Recycling for Electric Vehicle Motors.
    Jin H; Afiuny P; Dove S; Furlan G; Zakotnik M; Yih Y; Sutherland JW
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Mar; 52(6):3796-3802. PubMed ID: 29486124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tensile test and interface retention forces between wires and composites in lingual fixed retainers.
    Paolone MG; Kaitsas R; Obach P; Kaitsas V; Benedicenti S; Sorrenti E; Barberis F
    Int Orthod; 2015 Jun; 13(2):210-220. PubMed ID: 26003122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of prior sandblasting of the wire on the shear bond strength of two different types of lingual retainers.
    Kilinç DD; Sayar G
    Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 29631817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bond failure rates for V-loop vs straight wire lingual retainers.
    Lee KD; Mills CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):502-6. PubMed ID: 19361737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage between composite-wire and composite-enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 2: comparison of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing adhesive with conventional lingual retainer composite.
    Uysal T; Ulker M; Baysal A; Usumez S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):652-7. PubMed ID: 19858075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention.
    Rose E; Frucht S; Jonas IE
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 12238688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical comparison between Multi-Stranded Wires and Single strand Ribbon wires used for lingual fixed retainers.
    Arash V; Teimoorian M; Farajzadeh Jalali Y; Sheikhzadeh S
    Prog Orthod; 2020 Jun; 21(1):22. PubMed ID: 32596755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gingival health and relapse tendency: a prospective study of two types of lower fixed retainers.
    Al-Nimri K; Al Habashneh R; Obeidat M
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 20043549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements for bonding orthodontic retainers.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 19793779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The force-distance properties of attracting magnetic attachments for tooth movement in combination with clear sequential aligners.
    Phelan A; Petocz P; Walsh W; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):159-69. PubMed ID: 23304964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A modified thermoplastic retainer.
    Pithon MM
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 23021123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces.
    Littlewood SJ; Millett DT; Doubleday B; Bearn DR; Worthington HV
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jan; (1):CD002283. PubMed ID: 16437443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Displacement of teeth without and with bonded fixed orthodontic retainers: 3D analysis using triangular target frames and optoelectronic motion tracking device.
    Chakroun F; Colombo V; Lie Sam Foek D; Gallo LM; Feilzer A; Özcan M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Sep; 85():175-180. PubMed ID: 29906672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro comparison between a bonded retainer system and a directly bonded flexible spiral wire retainer.
    Bryan DC; Sherriff M
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Apr; 17(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 7781723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.