These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21976274)
1. Validation of the noninvasive assessment of central blood pressure by the SphygmoCor and Omron devices against the invasive catheter measurement. Ding FH; Fan WX; Zhang RY; Zhang Q; Li Y; Wang JG Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1306-11. PubMed ID: 21976274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the SphygmoCor and Omron devices in the estimation of pressure amplification against the invasive catheter measurement. Ding FH; Li Y; Zhang RY; Zhang Q; Wang JG J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 31(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 23188416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device. Weiss W; Gohlisch C; Harsch-Gladisch C; Tölle M; Zidek W; van der Giet M Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 22561735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation Study to Determine the Accuracy of Central Blood Pressure Measurement Using the Sphygmocor Xcel Cuff Device. Schultz MG; Picone DS; Armstrong MK; Black JA; Dwyer N; Roberts-Thomson P; Sharman JE Hypertension; 2020 Jul; 76(1):244-250. PubMed ID: 32475318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of noninvasive assessments of central blood pressure using general transfer function and late systolic shoulder of the radial pressure wave. Wohlfahrt P; Krajcoviechová A; Seidlerová J; Mayer O; Filipovsky J; Cífková R Am J Hypertens; 2014 Feb; 27(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 23999585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of three automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol: The Omron M3 Intellisense (HEM-7051-E), the Omron M2 Compact (HEM 7102-E), and the Omron R3-I Plus (HEM 6022-E). Asmar R; Khabouth J; Topouchian J; El Feghali R; Mattar J Blood Press Monit; 2010 Feb; 15(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 20032779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and reliability of central blood pressure estimated by upper arm oscillometric cuff pressure. Climie RE; Schultz MG; Nikolic SB; Ahuja KD; Fell JW; Sharman JE Am J Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 25(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 22223041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of central blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a comparison between SphygmoCor and invasively measured values. Laugesen E; Rossen NB; Peters CD; Mæng M; Ebbehøj E; Knudsen ST; Hansen KW; Bøtker HE; Poulsen PL Am J Hypertens; 2014 Feb; 27(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 24304654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cuff and aortic pressure differences during dobutamine infusion: a study of the effects of systolic blood pressure amplification. Smulyan H; Mukherjee R; Sheehe PR; Safar ME Am Heart J; 2010 Mar; 159(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 20211301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010. Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making. Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of central systolic blood pressure by pulse volume plethysmography with a noninvasive blood pressure monitor. Sung SH; Cheng HM; Chuang SY; Shih YT; Wang KL; Chen YH; Lin SJ; Yu WC; Chen CH Am J Hypertens; 2012 May; 25(5):542-8. PubMed ID: 22278210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement accuracy of a stand-alone oscillometric central blood pressure monitor: a validation report for Microlife WatchBP Office Central. Cheng HM; Sung SH; Shih YT; Chuang SY; Yu WC; Chen CH Am J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 26(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 23382326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the validity of oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement in a large population-based epidemiologic study. Chen Z; Wang X; Wang Z; Zhang L; Hao G; Dong Y; Zhu M; Gao R; J Am Soc Hypertens; 2017 Nov; 11(11):730-736.e4. PubMed ID: 29032943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Blood pressure in children aged 4-8 years: comparison of Omron HEM 711 and sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements. Midgley PC; Wardhaugh B; Macfarlane C; Magowan R; Kelnar CJ Arch Dis Child; 2009 Dec; 94(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 19608553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT). Topouchian JA; El Assaad MA; Orobinskaia LV; El Feghali RN; Asmar RG Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 16702826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors influencing the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement in critically ill patients. Bur A; Herkner H; Vlcek M; Woisetschläger C; Derhaschnig U; Delle Karth G; Laggner AN; Hirschl MM Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3):793-9. PubMed ID: 12626986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Calibration mode influences central blood pressure differences between SphygmoCor and two newer devices, the Arteriograph and Omron HEM-9000. Rezai MR; Goudot G; Winters C; Finn JD; Wu FC; Cruickshank JK Hypertens Res; 2011 Sep; 34(9):1046-51. PubMed ID: 21753770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study. Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]