These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2197658)
21. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall. Burgess JO; Gallo JR; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Ireland EJ Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Mair LH Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):483-90. PubMed ID: 9807127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical evaluation of a posterior resin composite: 3-year results. Wendt SL; Leinfelder KF Am J Dent; 1994 Aug; 7(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 7986437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In vitro marginal leakage of Class II composite resin restorations by thermal cycling. Futatsuki M; Nakata M J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 18(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 8054304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems. Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations. van Dijken JW Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite. Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In vitro microleakage of etched and rebonded Class 5 composite resin restorations. Munro GA; Hilton TJ; Hermesch CB Oper Dent; 1996; 21(5):203-8. PubMed ID: 9484173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years. Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Reinelt C; Frankenberger R Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Incremental techniques in direct composite restoration. Chandrasekhar V; Rudrapati L; Badami V; Tummala M J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(6):386-391. PubMed ID: 29430088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dental application of binary urethane monomer mixtures:strengthened resin matrix. Chowdhury NA; Wakasa K; Priyawan R; Yamaki M J Mater Sci Mater Med; 1997 Mar; 8(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 15348768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material. Gordan VV; Shen C; Watson RE; Mjor IA Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. 36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations. Swift EJ; Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 18686764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A 12-year clinical evaluation of two composite resins. Osborne JW; Norman RD; Gale EN Quintessence Int; 1990 Feb; 21(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 2197658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations. Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Studies on posterior composite resins with special reference to class II restorations. Lundin SA Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 73():1-41. PubMed ID: 2264013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]