BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2197659)

  • 21. In vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cement adhesion to dentin.
    Mason PN; Ferrari M
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jul; 25(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 7991772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations with and without light-cured glass-ionomer (poly alkenoate) cement lining.
    Shortall AC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Sep; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 1291025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparative analysis of techniques of restoring cervical lesions.
    Sidhu SK
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Aug; 24(8):553-9. PubMed ID: 8272493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of the XR bonding system on microleakage.
    Swift EJ; Hansen SE; Bailey SJ
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 2150171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Microleakage of capsulated glass ionomer cements.
    Scherer W; Kaim J; Gottlieb-Schein E; Roffe-Bauer M
    Am J Dent; 1989 Dec; 2(6):355-7. PubMed ID: 2700642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Glass-ionomer cements in Class V restorations].
    Prati C; Fratamico FC; Piana G
    Dent Cadmos; 1990 Nov; 58(18):60-4, 67. PubMed ID: 2097189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reducing microleakage in Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Crim GA; Chapman KW
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):781-5. PubMed ID: 7568683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: an in vitro study.
    Neme AM; Maxson BB; Pink FE; Aksu MN
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):600-5. PubMed ID: 12413226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Glass ionomer cement restorations: the effects of lasing the cavity walls on marginal microleakage.
    Liberman R; Eli I; Imber S; Shlezinger I
    Clin Prev Dent; 1990; 12(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 2376107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical placement of modern glass-ionomer cements.
    Mount GJ
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Feb; 24(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 8511271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Resin modified glass ionomer cements. In vitro microleakage in direct class V and class II sandwich restorations.
    Sjödin L; Uusitalo M; van Dijken J
    Swed Dent J; 1996; 20(3):77-86. PubMed ID: 8957133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns.
    Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC; Sorensen JA
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):445-53. PubMed ID: 15826701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.