These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21977479)
1. Determination of midsagittal plane for evaluation of facial asymmetry using three-dimensional computed tomography. Kim TY; Baik JS; Park JY; Chae HS; Huh KH; Choi SC Imaging Sci Dent; 2011 Jun; 41(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 21977479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical shape analysis-based determination of optimal midsagittal reference plane for evaluation of facial asymmetry. Shin SM; Kim YM; Kim NR; Choi YS; Park SB; Kim YI Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):252-60. PubMed ID: 27476357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deviation of landmarks in accordance with methods of establishing reference planes in three-dimensional facial CT evaluation. Yoon KW; Yoon SJ; Kang BC; Kim YH; Kook MS; Lee JS; Palomo JM Imaging Sci Dent; 2014 Sep; 44(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 25279341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry. Damstra J; Fourie Z; De Wit M; Ren Y Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):285-94. PubMed ID: 21271348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Landmark-based midsagittal plane analysis in patients with facial symmetry and asymmetry based on CBCT analysis tomography. Dobai A; Markella Z; Vízkelety T; Fouquet C; Rosta A; Barabás J J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Nov; 79(6):371-379. PubMed ID: 30255320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preliminary Study to Determine the Reference Plane of Patients With a Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Kim NR; Park SB; Shin SM; Choi YS; Kim SS; Son WS; Kim YI Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Nov; 54(6):707-714. PubMed ID: 27537492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Midsagittal Plane First: Building a Strong Facial Reference Frame for Computer-Aided Surgical Simulation. Grissom MK; Gateno J; English JD; Jacob HB; Kuang T; Gonzalez CE; Yuan P; Deng HH; Frick CJ; Kim D; Hassan A; Xia JJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Apr; 80(4):641-650. PubMed ID: 34942153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cone-beam Computed Tomography-based three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of mandible symmetry and the occlusal plane of adult patients with high-angle skeletal class III malocclusion and jaw deformity. Teng C; Liu C; Yu Q; Liu S Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Jul; 127():105157. PubMed ID: 34015688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationships between jaw deformity and the occlusal plane in cone beam computed tomography scans. Teng C; Zhong T; Yu Q J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jul; 128(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 33546859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Deep learning-assisted construction of three-demensional facial midsagittal plane]. Zhu YJ; Xu Q; Zhao YJ; Zhang L; Fu ZW; Wen AN; Gao ZX; Zhang J; Fu XL; Wang Y Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 Feb; 54(1):134-139. PubMed ID: 35165480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of two midsagittal planes in three-dimensional analysis and their measurement in patients with skeletal mandibular deviation: a comparative study. Zheng X; Wang L; Zhang B; Bai X; Qin K; Tian Y; Zhao R; Liu S; Wang J; Zhao Z Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 56(7):600-606. PubMed ID: 29980353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in positions of cone-beam computed tomography landmarks in patients with skeletal Class III facial asymmetry according to midsagittal planes. Noh HK; Kim HJ; Park HS Korean J Orthod; 2023 Jul; 53(4):219-231. PubMed ID: 37322899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional surgical simulation produce better surgical outcomes among patients with class III facial asymmetry? Udomlarptham N; Lin CH; Wang YC; Ko EW Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1022-1031. PubMed ID: 29606563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The location of midfacial landmarks according to the method of establishing the midsagittal reference plane in three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of facial asymmetry. Kim MS; Lee EJ; Song IJ; Lee JS; Kang BC; Yoon SJ Imaging Sci Dent; 2015 Dec; 45(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 26730370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional Analysis and Evaluation in Orthognathic Surgical Cases with Facial Asymmetry. Kogou T; Takaki T; Shibahara T Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2018; 59(3):147-161. PubMed ID: 30224609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cone-beam computed tomography based evaluation of rotational patterns of dentofacial structures in skeletal Class III deformity with mandibular asymmetry. Ryu HS; An KY; Kang KH Korean J Orthod; 2015 Jul; 45(4):153-63. PubMed ID: 26258061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Construction and validation of the midsagittal reference plane based on the skull base symmetry for three-dimensional cephalometric craniofacial analysis. Kim HJ; Kim BC; Kim JG; Zhengguo P; Kang SH; Lee SH J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 25(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 24469365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel method of constructing a stable reference frame for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis. Zhang D; Wang S; Li J; Zhou Y Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 30173843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular characteristics in patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion and chin deviation. Lv W; Nie Q; Gu Y Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Sep; 160(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 34175163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]