These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21977699)

  • 1. [Perceptual assessment of dysphonia: a training protocol with natural speech].
    Ghio A; Dufour S; Rouaze M; Bokanowski V; Pouchoulin G; Révis J; Giovanni A
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2011; 132(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 21977699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual evaluation of dysphonic voices: can a training protocol lead to the development of perceptual categories?
    Ghio A; Dufour S; Wengler A; Pouchoulin G; Revis J; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 25516201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Kapsner M; Rosenzweig J; Waugh P; Hillel A; Merati A
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 19765949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The effect of anchor voices and visible speech in training in the GRABS scale of perceptual evaluation of dysphonia].
    Núñez-Batalla F; Díaz-Molina JP; García-López I; Moreno-Méndez A; Costales-Marcos M; Moreno-Galindo C; Martínez-Camblor P
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2012; 63(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 22153964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Context influence on the perception of dysphonia: when the knowledge of the patient's clinical state can modify the results of perceptual voice quality assessment].
    Ghio A; Merienne S; Giovanni A
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2011; 132(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 21977698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Top-down mechanisms in dysphonia perception: the need for blind tests.
    Ghio A; Révis J; Merienne S; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):481-5. PubMed ID: 23809570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Student training to perceptually assess severity of dysphonia using the dysphonic severity percentage scale.
    Schaeffer N
    J Voice; 2013 Sep; 27(5):611-6. PubMed ID: 23876942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Post-therapy Dysphonic Voices and Normal Voices.
    Schaeffer N; Fuse A
    J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):581.e1-581.e6. PubMed ID: 29449063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward a more quantitative measure to assess severity of dysphonia: preliminary observations.
    Schaeffer N; Sidavi A
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 19616403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonlinear dynamic analysis of disordered voice: the relationship between the correlation dimension (D2) and pre-/post-treatment change in perceived dysphonia severity.
    Awan SN; Roy N; Jiang JJ
    J Voice; 2010 May; 24(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 19502002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The phonatory deviation diagram: a novel objective measurement of vocal function.
    Madazio G; Leão S; Behlau M
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2011; 63(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 21625144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of listener experience and anchors on judgments of dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Kapsner-Smith M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Apr; 54(2):430-47. PubMed ID: 20884782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of listener experience on Consensus Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) ratings of postthyroidectomy voice.
    Helou LB; Solomon NP; Henry LR; Coppit GL; Howard RS; Stojadinovic A
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2010 Aug; 19(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 20484704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of VHI scores in teachers with voice disorders and the non-professional dysphonic population].
    Kuzańska A; Niebudek-Bogusz E; Woźnicka E; Kopczyńska J; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Med Pr; 2009; 60(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 19928428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of training on naïve listeners' judgments of the speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Ellis LW; Beltyukova SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1114-23. PubMed ID: 18664708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors predicting patient perception of dysphonia caused by benign vocal fold lesions.
    Behrman A; Sulica L; He T
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Oct; 114(10):1693-700. PubMed ID: 15454756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vocal stability in functional dysphonic versus healthy voices at different times of voice loading.
    Jilek C; Marienhagen J; Hacki T
    J Voice; 2004 Dec; 18(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 15567046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developing auditory-perceptual judgment reliability in otolaryngology residents.
    Misono S; Merati AL; Eadie TL
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 22019147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15766846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.