These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21977961)

  • 1. Affective imagery and acceptance of replacing nuclear power plants.
    Keller C; Visschers V; Siegrist M
    Risk Anal; 2012 Mar; 32(3):464-77. PubMed ID: 21977961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster.
    Visschers VH; Siegrist M
    Risk Anal; 2013 Feb; 33(2):333-47. PubMed ID: 22762151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining the relationship between affect and implicit associations: implications for risk perception.
    Dohle S; Keller C; Siegrist M
    Risk Anal; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1116-28. PubMed ID: 20409044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The role of the operator of nuclear power plants in disposal of nuclear waste].
    Chaussade JP
    Rev Prat; 1995 Mar; 45(6 Spec No):67-70. PubMed ID: 7754329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regulation of nuclear radiation exposures in India.
    Mishra UC
    J Environ Radioact; 2004; 72(1-2):97-102. PubMed ID: 15162860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Communicating with stakeholders about nuclear power plant radiation.
    Bisconti AS
    Health Phys; 2011 Jan; 100(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 21399419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceived risk and benefit of nuclear waste repositories: four opinion clusters.
    Seidl R; Moser C; Stauffacher M; Krütli P
    Risk Anal; 2013 Jun; 33(6):1038-48. PubMed ID: 23020311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceived environmental and health risks of nuclear energy in Taiwan after Fukushima nuclear disaster.
    Ho JC; Lee CT; Kao SF; Chen RY; Ieong MC; Chang HL; Hsieh WH; Tzeng CC; Lu CF; Lin SL; Chang PW
    Environ Int; 2014 Dec; 73():295-303. PubMed ID: 25181579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reversing nuclear opposition: evolving public acceptance of a permanent nuclear waste disposal facility.
    Jenkins-Smith HC; Silva CL; Nowlin MC; deLozier G
    Risk Anal; 2011 Apr; 31(4):629-44. PubMed ID: 21175714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Verdicts on radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from IARC and ICNIRP. Verifying Canadian nuclear energy worker radiation risk: a reanalysis of cancer mortality in Canadian nuclear energy workers (1957-1994). Childhood cancer in the vicinity of nuclear power plants: results of the CANUPIS study. Environment Agencies' statement on Radioactive Waste Advisers and associated guidance. BBC Trust-BBC science coverage given 'vote of confidence' by independent report.
    J Radiol Prot; 2011 Sep; 31(3):373-6. PubMed ID: 21865625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiological effluents released by U.S. commercial nuclear power plants from 1995-2005.
    Harris JT; Miller DW
    Health Phys; 2008 Dec; 95(6):734-43. PubMed ID: 19001900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Security risks in nuclear waste management: Exceptionalism, opaqueness and vulnerability.
    Vander Beken T; Dorn N; Van Daele S
    J Environ Manage; 2010; 91(4):940-8. PubMed ID: 20022419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An emotion-based model of risk perception and stigma susceptibility: cognitive appraisals of emotion, affective reactivity, worldviews, and risk perceptions in the generation of technological stigma.
    Peters EM; Burraston B; Mertz CK
    Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1349-67. PubMed ID: 15563300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Reliability of covariates in baseline survey of a cohort study: Epidemiological Investigation on Cancer Risk Among Residents Who Reside Near The Nuclear Power Plants in Korea].
    Bae S; Park BY; Li ZM; Ahn YO
    J Prev Med Public Health; 2010 Mar; 43(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 20383049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tale taming radioactive fears: Linking nuclear waste disposal to the "continuum of the good".
    Yli-Kauhaluoma S; Hänninen H
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Apr; 23(3):316-30. PubMed ID: 24113741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste.
    Bickerstaff K; Lorenzoni I; Pidgeon NF; Poortinga W; Simmons P
    Public Underst Sci; 2008 Apr; 17(2):145-69. PubMed ID: 19391376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of distance, age and sex upon attitudes toward nuclear power plants: an empirical study.
    Hüppe M; Weber J
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1999 Aug; 202(2-4):331-44. PubMed ID: 10507137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A proliferation of nuclear waste for the Southeast.
    Alvarez R; Smith S
    J S C Med Assoc; 2007 Dec; 103(9):259-62. PubMed ID: 18284081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Processing of liquid radioactive waste by RADON Industrial Research Association].
    Panteleev VI; Dmitriev SA; Sobolev IA; Karlin IuV; Demkin VI; Adamovich DV; Slastennikov IuT; Il'in VA
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2006; (2):25-9. PubMed ID: 16568842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The future of nuclear power: value orientations and risk perception.
    Whitfield SC; Rosa EA; Dan A; Dietz T
    Risk Anal; 2009 Mar; 29(3):425-37. PubMed ID: 19000075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.